JCPS School Improvement Planning

CSIP Activity Database

Start with the school’s CSIP goal. Filters on this page are private and never change another person’s results.

Available activities

Showing 348 of 348 activities

ReadingReading ObjectiveStandards & Learning Clarity

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Conduct grade-level or content-area standards review sessions focused on unpacking priority standards and identifying the intended depth of learning.

Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

standards unpacking notes; priority standards maps; PLC agendas/minutes showing standards review; teacher-created learning progressions.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveStandards & Learning Clarity

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Develop or refine common learning intentions and success criteria for upcoming units so students understand what they are expected to learn and how they will demonstrate mastery.

Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveStandards & Learning Clarity

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review lesson plans, walkthrough evidence, and student work samples to determine whether learning intentions and success criteria are being used consistently.

Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Schedule quarterly curriculum checks during PLCs or collaborative team meetings to review pacing, standards alignment, and resource use.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected and analyzed quarterly; summary shared with PLCs/ILT after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use common planning time to compare upcoming instructional materials and assessments to the expectations of the standards.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Adjust unit plans when evidence shows that instruction, resources, or assessments are not fully aligned to grade-level expectations.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Hold vertical team meetings at least two times per year to review how key reading and math standards progress across grade levels.

Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected during fall and spring vertical/team reviews; findings shared with ILT and grade/content teams after each session.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Identify prerequisite skills that students need for upcoming grade-level content and determine where those skills will be reinforced.

Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use student work and assessment data to identify common gaps between grade levels and adjust instructional planning accordingly.

Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review available instructional resources to determine which materials are most aligned to the standards and appropriate for Tier I instruction.

Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Provide teachers with planning support on how to use HQIRs without lowering the rigor of the task or standard.

Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Monitor classroom implementation through walkthroughs, lesson plan reviews, and PLC discussions focused on resource use and student access to grade-level work.

Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use PLCs to review recent assessment results and identify standards where students need reteaching, extension, or additional scaffolding.

Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Plan short-term instructional adjustments based on student evidence, including small groups, targeted practice, or changes to questioning and feedback.

Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Revisit student work after adjustments are made to determine whether students are making progress toward the standard.

Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Identify common barriers that prevent students from accessing grade-level reading and math tasks.

Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Plan scaffolds such as vocabulary support, worked examples, models, sentence stems, manipulatives, or guided practice without changing the expected learning outcome.

Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review disaggregated student work and assessment results to determine whether students receiving supports are still engaging with grade-level standards.

Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Train staff to use the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT) during instructional planning.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)

Who monitors

Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads

Evidence

Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation evidence; OAT guidance or planning tools.

How often

During initial professional learning and follow-up as needed.

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use the OAT in PLCs during unit or cycle planning to review instructional materials.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)

Who monitors

Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads

Evidence

Completed OAT reviews; PLC agendas/minutes; unit or cycle planning artifacts.

How often

During unit or cycle planning in PLCs.

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Revise or supplement lessons and materials based on findings from the OAT review.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)

Who monitors

Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads

Evidence

Revised or supplemented lessons/materials; follow-up OAT reviews; PLC planning artifacts.

How often

Reviewed during subsequent PLC/unit planning cycles.

ReadingReading ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Ensure teachers and specialists have required resource materials for their specific content area and grade level.

Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.

Who monitors

Academic/Instructional Coaches & Department Chairs (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Building Principal & District Curriculum Director

Evidence

Physical resource audit checklists for EL (ELA) & IM (Math); Staff resource gap/request forms

How often

Annually (Pre-service in August); Bi-weekly (First month of school)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Remove existing resources not outlined in the local curriculum document as primary or potential supplemental resources from classroom use.

Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.

Who monitors

Building Leadership Team & Grade-Level/Department Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers

Evidence

Classroom inventory checklists; Core curriculum alignment audits

How often

Once per semester (Start of Fall/Spring terms)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None

ReadingReading ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Ensure all classrooms have the resources required to access any digital components of the HQIR and staff and students have the appropriate credentials to access them.

Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.

Who monitors

Leadership Team; School Technology Lead?; Shares: Principals & Instructional Coaches

Evidence

Account creation/login success logs for EL, IM, and i-Ready; Student device accessibility audits

How often

Weekly during August/September; Monthly ongoing check-ins

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Communicate the locally determined pacing window aligned to guidance provided by the HQIR.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

Content Area Chairs & Instructional Coaches (Collect/Analyze); Shares: PLC Teams & Principal

Evidence

EL and IM year-long pacing guides; Unit pacing map alignment checklists

How often

Monthly pacing audits during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Communicate “non-negotiables” related to use of the HQIR.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: All Certified Staff

Evidence

HQIR implementation non-negotiable matrix; Professional development sign-in sheets

How often

Quarterly review meetings; Annually during pre-service

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Align relevant school-level policies, structures and procedures to support HQIR implementation and increase coherence.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

School Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: SBDM Council & District Leadership

Evidence

Master schedule alignment audit; PLC operational guidelines & SBDM policies

How often

Bi-annually (Beginning and mid-year)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review and Modify Schedules (if necessary) to ensure adequate time for implementation of the HQIR.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

Principal & Assistant Principal; Shares: Grade-Level Teams & District Admin

Evidence

Master schedules reflecting required block lengths (e.g., 90-min EL, 60-min IM); WIN/Intervention schedules

How often

Annually in July/August; Quarterly adjustment check

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review any adjustments to policies, structures and procedures relevant to curriculum implementation.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

SBDM Council & Building Principal; Shares: School Leadership Team & Staff

Evidence

SBDM (policy) minutes; Revised curriculum alignment documentation

How often

Quarterly policy reviews

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review the common observation tool for receiving feedback and relevant indicators related to implementation and instruction.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Principal & Assistant Principals (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Instructional Staff

Evidence

High-yield practice walkthrough rubrics/scoring; Walkthrough alignment & calibration notes

How often

Monthly calibration sessions; Quarterly feedback trends

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review roles and expectations for implementation and instruction monitoring, including observation, coaching, feedback, and data analysis from formative, interim, and summative assessments, as well as student work.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Who: Leadership Team & Instructional Coaches; Shares: PLC Teams

Evidence

Coaching logs & observation schedule calendar; PLC feedback protocols & assessment calendars

How often

Monthly administrative reviews; Quarterly alignment checks

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Create a process for soliciting and responding to questions or feedback from staff about the implementation of the HQIR.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: PLC Leaders & District Curriculum Team

Evidence

Digital feedback forms / pulse surveys; "Q&A / Feedback" agenda items in PLCs

How often

Bi-weekly during Launch stage; Monthly post-launch

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Communicate key information related to the implementation of the HQIR with students and families.

Strategy: Strengthen communication about HQIR implementation so students, families, and staff understand expectations, changes, and available supports.

Who monitors

Principals & Classroom Teachers; Shares: Parents/Guardians & SBDM Council

Evidence

Parent newsletters, family curriculum nights, and EL/IM family overview letters

How often

Monthly newsletters; Fall & Winter Open House/Nights

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Engage in PL to build understanding of the instructional approach and design of the HQIR, how it aligns to the instructional vision and what strong implementation looks like.

Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.

Who monitors

Instructional Coaches & District Curriculum Lead; Shares: All Certified Teachers

Evidence

Pre/Post PL confidence survey data; Attendance & completion tracking logs

How often

Monthly PL sessions

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Monitor pacing to stay within the locally determined window.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Grade-Level/Department Chairs (Collect); Shares: Principal & Academic Coach

Evidence

EL & IM unit pacing tracker sheets; i-Ready & CERT benchmark testing progress

How often

Bi-weekly in PLCs; 3x per year (Fall, Winter, Spring)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Conduct formal step-backs (quarterly, end of year) to review implementation data and use those discussions to drive improvements in implementation.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Principal, Leadership Team, & District Admin; Shares: School Community & SBDM

Evidence

Quarterly Step-Back data packets; Revised implementation action plans

How often

Quarterly (Oct, Jan, Mar, June)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Clearly communicate what Is and Is Not recommended adjustment of the HQIR (including supplementation).

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

District Curriculum Team & Academic Coach; Shares: All Instructional Staff

Evidence

HQIR Flexibility Guidance Matrix; PLC unit planning agendas

How often

Annually (Pre-service); At start of new units

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Support the onboarding of new staff by providing guidance on the HQIR and lessons learned from initial implementation.

Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Mentor Teachers; Shares: Principal

Evidence

New teacher onboarding checklist; Mentor/Mentee meeting logs

How often

Monthly during year 1

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Ensure curriculum-based professional learning structures (shared learning workshops, PLCs for intellectual preparation, etc.) are in place.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal & PLC Facilitators; Shares: Academic Coach & District Leadership

Evidence

Master PLC meeting schedules; Dedicated intellectual preparation time logs

How often

Weekly during PLC blocks

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Implement, participate in, and monitor PLCs focused on HQIR implementation.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal, AP, & Academic Coach (Collect); Shares: PLC Teams & District Admin

Evidence

PLC agenda/minutes digital repository; Walkthrough data from PLC observations

How often

Weekly (Minutes review); Monthly (PLC observation summary)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Protect time in the curriculum-based professional learning structures from being used for initiatives unrelated to implementation.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership

Evidence

Approved PLC agendas (audited for focus); Time-allocation feedback logs

How often

Bi-weekly agenda audits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Establish expectation that the approved protocols (e.g., unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal, student work analysis) are used to support intellectual preparation within PLCs.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Grade-Level Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers

Evidence

Completed EL/IM Unit & Lesson Internalization templates?; Student work analysis protocols

How often

Weekly during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide and engage in PL to build understanding of intellectual preparation, beginning with unit internalization, and provide time for PLCs to internalize units.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

District Specialists & Academic Coach; Shares: School Leadership Team

Evidence

Unit internalization artifacts (e.g., annotated EL/IM units); PL evaluation exit tickets

How often

Monthly dedicated sessions; At start of each unit

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Create and execute a PL plan aligned to the implementation goals and set the expectation for required participation.

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: Certified Staff

Evidence

PL attendance records & implementation surveys; Walkthrough indicators of PL application

How often

Monthly PL tracking; Quarterly efficacy reviews

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Engage in shared learning to build understanding of the core processes of intellectual preparation (unit and lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis) using the district-determined protocols.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Department/Grade-Level Teams

Evidence

Completed student work analysis protocols

How often

Weekly during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Participate in professional learning opportunities that deepen understanding of the HQIR’s instructional design and use in classroom practice.

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

District Curriculum Specialists & Vendors; Shares: Teachers & Building Admin

Evidence

Coaching logs & model classroom visit notes; High-yield walkthrough practice growth metrics

How often

Monthly coaching rounds; Quarterly growth audits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Regularly observe teacher practice and provide feedback on HQIR implementation using a common observational tool (e.g., vendor-specific tool, KDE-provided observation tool).

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Principal, AP, & Academic Coach; Shares: Individual Teachers & Staff

Evidence

Walkthrough tool data (focus on student collaboration & engagement); Coaching feedback email/logs

How often

Weekly (5–10 walks per admin); Bi-weekly individual check-ins

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide professional learning, including coaching, classroom observations, targeted feedback and model classroom visits anchored in the HQIR.

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Master Teachers; Shares: Principal & District Specialists

Evidence

Coaching cycle logs & pre/post observation forms; Peer observation reflection sheets

How often

Bi-weekly coaching cycles; Monthly model classroom visits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use the HQIR as designed and ensure the majority of instruction is spent engaged with the HQIR.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Administrative Team; Shares: Teachers & PLC Teams

Evidence

Walkthrough tool fidelity ratings (EL/IM adherence); Daily schedule / time-on-task checks

How often

Weekly walkthroughs; Monthly trend reporting

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use HQIR-embedded supports to ensure all students can engage in grade-level work.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

ECE Lead, ELL Teachers, & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal

Evidence

Lesson plan audits (scaffolds/accommodations); i-Ready diagnostic tier movement (K–8); CERT subgroup performance (HS)

How often

Weekly during PLC planning; 3x per year post-diagnostics

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Document if/when the HQIR resources may need refinement (e.g., for alignment to the KAS) and communicate with school/district leaders.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Department Chairs & Academic Coach; Shares: District Curriculum Director

Evidence

HQIR refinement log / feedback form; KAS alignment gap documentation

How often

Monthly submission to district

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Co-observe classrooms with district leaders.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Building Admin & District Supervisors; Shares: Observed Teachers

Evidence

Co-observation calibration notes; Walkthrough tool data validity reports

How often

Quarterly co-observation rounds

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Observe PLCs and provide feedback on intellectual preparation (unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis).

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators

Evidence

PLC observation rubric & feedback notes; Intellectual prep artifact quality checks

How often

Bi-weekly PLC observations

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide ongoing opportunities for teachers to develop leadership capacities, including classroom practice specific to HQIR implementation and facilitating intellectual preparation in PLCs.

Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.

Who monitors

Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: Leadership Council

Evidence

Lead Teacher / PLC Facilitator training logs; Peer coaching debrief forms

How often

Monthly teacher leader meetings

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Sustain a collaborative environment where professional learning communities use their collective strengths, skills and experience to improve classroom practice related to HQIR implementation.

Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.

Who monitors

PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Building Principal

Evidence

PLC peer feedback forms & self-evaluations; Collaborative unit plans

How often

Weekly (PLCs); Quarterly culture audits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Engage with school leaders in identifying personal targets for feedback and support.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers & Instructional Coach; Shares: Principal (PGP alignment)

Evidence

Professional Growth Plans (PGPs); Coaching goal tracking logs

How often

Bi-annually (Fall target set, Spring review)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

ReadingReading ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Develop and execute a district-aligned professional learning plan that addresses teacher needs related to HQIR implementation and making adjustments to the curriculum. LE COMMENT: Slightly abridged

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

District Curriculum Director & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff

Evidence

District PL completion reports; Classroom walkthrough implementation trends

How often

Quarterly progress reports

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide feedback to teachers on the facilitation of intellectual prep within PLCs and on skillful use of HQIR in classrooms to meet students’ diverse learning needs.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators & Teachers

Evidence

Walkthrough tool reports (differentiation/talk focus); PLC feedback summary forms

How often

Bi-weekly walkthrough notes; Monthly coaching meetings

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Establish time for reflection on the ways in which teachers use HQIR to support diverse learning needs through curriculum embedded supports. Provide opportunities for teachers to observe each other’s practice and share feedback.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Teachers; Shares: Grade-Level Teams

Evidence

Peer observation reflection forms; EL/IM scaffolding utilization logs

How often

1x per semester per teacher

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Make smart adjustments to the HQIR using information about students’ needs and performance.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC Teams & Interventionists; Shares: Academic Coach & AP

Evidence

i-Ready grouping & flexible rotation rosters; WIN block intervention schedules

How often

Bi-weekly in PLCs; Every 3 weeks (MTSS check)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Purposefully leverage scaffolds within the HQIR to support all students in accessing grade-level learning and reaching unit and lesson goals.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers & Interventionists; Shares: PLC Teams

Evidence

Scaffolding logs (graphic organizers, sentence frames); Walkthrough tool data on student participation

How often

Weekly during lesson prep; Weekly walkthroughs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Purposefully plan connections to students’ backgrounds and experiences to enhance relevance in the classroom environment.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers; Shares: PLC Teams & Leadership

Evidence

Student interest inventory results; Culturally responsive lesson plans

How often

At start of each EL/IM unit

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Identify two schoolwide culturally responsive instructional practices from the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT).

Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Selected schoolwide practices and OAT review evidence.

How often

At the start of the implementation cycle; revisit as needed.

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Introduce and model the selected practices during staff meetings, PLCs, or Gold Days.

Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Meeting/PL agendas, modeling materials, staff participation artifacts.

How often

During planned staff learning sessions.

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Plan for and use the selected practices during instruction.

Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Walkthrough evidence aligned to the selected practices; disaggregated implementation results; coaching notes.

How often

Monthly walkthrough review; quarterly trend review.

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide professional learning on culturally responsive teaching, implicit bias, and inclusive practices.

Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation and reflection artifacts.

How often

At planned professional learning sessions.

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Identify two or three inclusive instructional strategies for staff to apply in instruction.

Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Selected strategy list; lesson/planning artifacts; walkthrough evidence.

How often

Reviewed monthly through planning/walkthrough evidence.

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide time for reflection, collaboration, and coaching connected to the selected strategies.

Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Staff reflections, meeting agendas, coaching notes, and follow-up walkthrough evidence.

How often

Quarterly reflection and coaching review.

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use a common lesson planning protocol that includes standards, learning intentions, success criteria, checks for understanding, and planned scaffolds.

Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Conduct regular walkthroughs focused on evidence of clear learning expectations and student access to grade-level work.

Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use PLC time to revise upcoming lessons based on student needs and evidence from prior instruction.

Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide professional learning on instructional practices such as modeling, questioning, academic discussion, feedback, and gradual release.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Have teachers plan specific opportunities for students to explain reasoning, discuss ideas, revise work, or justify answers.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use peer observation, coaching, or walkthrough feedback to support implementation of the selected instructional practices.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Develop a walkthrough focus connected to the school’s instructional priority, such as success criteria, questioning, student discourse, or feedback.

Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Share walkthrough trends with teachers during PLCs, staff meetings, or coaching conversations.

Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use the trends to identify specific instructional adjustments and follow up to determine whether the adjustments are evident in classrooms.

Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Teach students how to use success criteria, rubrics, checklists, or exemplars to assess their own progress.

Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Build in regular student reflection or goal-setting opportunities connected to academic, behavior, or attendance data.

Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide time for students to revise work based on feedback and explain what they changed and why.

Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use exit tickets, student work, formative checks, or common assessments to identify students who need additional support or extension.

Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Regroup students for short-term support based on the specific skill or standard being addressed.

Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Review follow-up evidence to determine whether the instructional adjustment improved student understanding.

Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Review lesson tasks for opportunities to connect content to student interests, real-world issues, cultural connections, or meaningful problem-solving.

Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Gather student feedback on engagement, belonging, and access to learning tasks.

Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use feedback and classroom evidence to adjust instructional examples, texts, tasks, or discussion structures.

Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Analyze student work from HQIR-embedded assessments to identify strengths and gaps in student learning.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of HQIR-embedded assessments and student work so teachers identify strengths, gaps, and next instructional steps.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal

Evidence

EL module assessments & IM end-of-unit tests; Standardized student work rubric scores

How often

Bi-weekly during PLC cycles

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Communicate schoolwide expectations for assessment, grading, feedback, revision, and communication of student progress to families.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Schoolwide assessment/grading expectations; communication materials; evidence of consistent implementation.

How often

Reviewed at the beginning of the year and periodically during PLC cycles.

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Provide professional learning on using success criteria to determine student progress.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Professional learning artifacts; success criteria; student work showing use of criteria.

How often

During PLC/professional learning cycles.

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop, review, and refine common assessments in PLCs to ensure alignment to grade-level standards and intended rigor.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Common assessments; alignment reviews; PLC notes; assessment revisions.

How often

Monthly or during assessment development/review cycles.

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Use student work and assessment data to plan feedback, revision, reteaching, and next instructional steps.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Common assessment data; student work; evidence of feedback/revision; reteaching plans; disaggregated diagnostic/assessment data.

How often

After each assessment window and during PLC cycles.

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review and revise the school’s grading system through PLC and administrative team discussions.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Grading practices/policies; PLC and administrative team notes; evidence of revisions.

How often

Quarterly.

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Systems

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Create or review the school’s assessment calendar to identify when each type of assessment is used and what decision it informs.

Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Systems

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review assessments during PLCs to check alignment to standards, learning intentions, and success criteria.

Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Systems

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Clarify how teachers will use assessment results for reteaching, regrouping, enrichment, intervention, or progress monitoring.

Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Provide professional learning on assessment alignment, item/task rigor, success criteria, and common scoring expectations.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Have teams review assessment items or tasks before administration to determine whether they match the standard and expected depth of knowledge.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Revise or replace assessment items that do not provide useful evidence of student mastery.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop common expectations for how success criteria will be shared, referenced, and used during instruction.

Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Plan opportunities for students to receive feedback tied directly to the success criteria.

Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review student work samples to determine whether feedback is helping students improve the quality of their work.

Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Use a common student work analysis protocol during PLCs or collaborative team meetings.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Sort student work by level of mastery and identify patterns in misconceptions or unfinished learning.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Plan instructional responses based on the evidence and revisit student work after reteaching or additional support.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review current grading practices to identify inconsistencies across classrooms or teams.

Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop common expectations for grading standards-based tasks, reassessment, missing work, and feedback.

Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Compare grading evidence with student work and assessment results to determine whether grades reflect demonstrated learning.

Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Communication

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop a consistent process for sharing assessment information with students and families in clear, understandable language.

Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Communication

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Include specific next steps when communicating academic progress, such as skills to practice, supports available, or upcoming reassessment opportunities.

Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment Communication

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Use family/student feedback to determine whether assessment communication is understandable and useful.

Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Set implementation goals, collect data aligned to implementation goals (e.g., from instructional walks, PLC work/observations, student work), and analyze data to effectively support reflection and decision-making at the school level.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.

Who monitors

Leadership Team & Academic Coach; Shares: Whole Staff & District Office

Evidence

High-yield walkthrough tool data dashboards; PLC observation logs & student work protocols

How often

Monthly leadership reviews; Quarterly step-back meetings

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Engage in reflection on the impact of the curriculum and HQIR on students.

Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.

Who monitors

PLC Teams & Guidance Counselors; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership

Evidence

i-Ready Growth Reports (K–8); CERT score trends (HS); Student focus group feedback

How often

3x per year (i-Ready/CERT Windows); Monthly during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Set yearly implementation goals and develop an aligned monitoring plan.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.

Who monitors

Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: Staff, SBDM, & District Admin

Evidence

Annual CSIP / Implementation Plan; Key Performance Indicator (KPI) dashboard

How often

Annually (June/July planning)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Utilize the school leadership team to own gathering, organizing and using data and feedback to drive implementation improvements. Continue to use data from formal stepbacks (quarterly, end of year), celebrate “bright spots” to elevate evidence of HQIR’s instructional impact and to identify challenges to potentially refine the implementation plan.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.

Who monitors

School Leadership Team; Shares: Whole Staff & SBDM Council

Evidence

i-Ready (K–8), CERT (HS), and KSA data analysis packets; Bright spots and challenge reports

How often

3x per year (Post i-Ready/CERT); Annually (Post KSA release)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Continue to participate in learning opportunities and data conversations that help deepen understanding of the HQIR and its instructional shifts.

Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Department Chairs; Shares: Certified Teachers

Evidence

Advanced EL/IM workshop attendance; Student engagement walkthrough data

How often

Monthly PLCs; Quarterly district PL

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Collect, analyze, and use data from HQIM-embedded assessments to drive the school-specific assessment strategy and implementation improvements.

Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.

Who monitors

PLC Teams & Data Specialist; Shares: Principal & MTSS Team

Evidence

EL Module & IM Unit mastery charts; i-Ready prerequisite / growth reports

How often

Bi-weekly (Unit assessments); 3x per year (Diagnostics)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Regularly analyze student work and curriculum-embedded assessments to determine student needs and provide aligned intervention as needed.

Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.

Who monitors

MTSS/Tier II Team & PLC Groups; Shares: Principal & District Coordinator

Evidence

i-Ready progress monitoring probes (K–8); CERT skill-gap tracking (HS); Tier II/III intervention rosters

How often

Weekly/Bi-weekly (Probes); Monthly (MTSS Data Reviews)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Establish a recurring data meeting schedule for PLCs, grade-level teams, or intervention teams.

Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Use a common data protocol to identify strengths, concerns, root causes, and next steps.

Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review academic, behavior, attendance, and access data by student group during scheduled leadership or PLC meetings.

Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Identify where gaps exist in performance, participation, placement, intervention, advanced coursework, or discipline outcomes.

Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Select specific actions to address the gaps and monitor whether those actions improve outcomes over time.

Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review formative and interim data shortly after assessments are administered.

Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Identify standards or skills where students need reteaching, extension, or additional practice.

Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Plan and implement short-cycle instructional responses, then review follow-up evidence to check for improvement.

Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review multiple data sources before placing students in interventions, enrichment, or other supports.

Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Establish clear criteria for entering, adjusting, or exiting supports.

Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Monitor student progress regularly to ensure students are receiving the right level of support.

Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Provide students with age-appropriate data reflection tools or goal-setting templates.

Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Schedule regular student conferences or reflection opportunities focused on progress and next steps.

Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

ReadingReading ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Teach students how to connect their effort, strategies, attendance, and behavior to learning outcomes.

Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review multiple data sources during leadership team meetings, including assessment results, walkthrough trends, attendance, behavior, survey data, and intervention data.

Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Identify whether current programs or supports are producing the intended results for all student groups.

Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Adjust resources, schedules, professional learning, or support structures based on the evidence reviewed.

Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Map current supports across academics, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional learning to identify overlaps, gaps, or unclear processes.

Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Develop clear referral, intervention, and follow-up procedures for students needing additional support.

Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review support data regularly to determine whether students are receiving timely and appropriate assistance.

Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use screening and diagnostic data to identify specific student needs before assigning interventions.

Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Match students to interventions based on the skill, behavior, attendance pattern, or support need identified.

Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review progress monitoring data at scheduled intervals to determine whether to continue, adjust, intensify, or exit the intervention.

Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Define what full implementation of each intervention or support should look like, including frequency, duration, and responsible staff.

Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use documentation logs, intervention records, or fidelity checks to monitor whether supports are being delivered as intended.

Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Provide follow-up support to staff when implementation evidence shows inconsistency.

Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review school schedules to determine whether intervention, enrichment, and support time are protected and accessible.

Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use student need data to assign staff, materials, and support time where they are most needed.

Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Monitor whether students from all groups have access to the supports and opportunities intended for them.

Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveOpportunity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review participation data by student group for advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE, or other rigorous opportunities.

Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveOpportunity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Identify barriers that may limit access, such as referral practices, prerequisites, scheduling, communication, or student/family awareness.

Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveOpportunity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Adjust identification, communication, scheduling, or support processes to increase equitable participation.

Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveContinuous Improvement

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use tools such as root cause analysis, PDSA cycles, or problem-solving protocols to examine support system concerns.

Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveContinuous Improvement

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Select a specific adjustment to test, such as a revised referral process, attendance intervention, or progress monitoring routine.

Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveContinuous Improvement

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review implementation and outcome data to determine whether the adjustment should be continued, revised, or stopped.

Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review and respond to questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data from surveys, focus groups, etc.

Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.

Who monitors

Leadership Team & SBDM Council; Shares: Whole Staff

Evidence

Anonymous staff implementation climate surveys; Focus group feedback summary sheets

How often

Mid-year (December); End-of-year (May)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Respond to the questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data gathered from surveys, focus groups, etc.

Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.

Who monitors

Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff

Evidence

Climate & Culture Survey results; Action item follow-up memos

How often

Bi-annually (Nov/April)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Communicate the instructional vision and belief that all students can be successful with rigorous, grade-level work.

Strategy: Build a shared instructional culture by consistently communicating high expectations and the belief that all students can succeed with rigorous, grade-level work.

Who monitors

Principal & SBDM Council; Shares: Staff, Students, & Parents

Evidence

Principal messages, staff bulletin items, and vision posters; Student survey results

How often

Monthly communications; Quarterly assemblies?

IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Define common expectations for classroom routines, relationships, student discussion, and respectful interactions.

Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Conduct walkthroughs or classroom visits focused on evidence of belonging, engagement, and student willingness to participate.

Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Use student feedback and classroom evidence to identify where additional support is needed.

Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveBehavior Supports

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Teach, model, and practice schoolwide behavior expectations and routines throughout the year.

Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Implementation checked during the first 30 days and revisited monthly; trends shared during monthly staff/ILT meetings.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveBehavior Supports

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review behavior and referral data to identify common locations, times, or expectations needing reteaching.

Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveBehavior Supports

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Provide staff with consistent procedures for responding to behavior concerns and reinforcing positive behavior.

Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Use PLCs or collaborative teams to review student learning, behavior, attendance, and engagement data.

Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Identify shared adult actions that can be implemented across classrooms or teams.

Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Revisit results to determine whether the shared actions are improving student outcomes.

Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveSEL & Self-Management

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Teach SEL and self-management skills through advisory, morning meetings, classroom routines, or explicit lessons.

Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveSEL & Self-Management

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Provide students with tools for goal setting, reflection, conflict resolution, and responsible decision-making.

Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveSEL & Self-Management

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Monitor behavior, attendance, and classroom engagement data to determine whether SEL practices are supporting improved outcomes.

Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

ReadingReading ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Communicate school expectations, academic supports, attendance information, and behavior supports in family-friendly language.

Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Identify community partners who can support attendance, mentoring, enrichment, basic needs, or family engagement.

Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review family feedback and participation data to determine whether communication and partnership efforts are reaching families effectively.

Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

ReadingReading ObjectiveAuthentic Learning

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Plan tasks that require students to apply learning, explain thinking, solve problems, or connect content to real-world situations.

Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveAuthentic Learning

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Build in classroom routines that normalize mistakes, revision, and productive struggle.

Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveAuthentic Learning

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review student work and engagement evidence to determine whether students are participating in meaningful, appropriately challenging learning experiences.

Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStandards & Learning Clarity

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Conduct grade-level or content-area standards review sessions focused on unpacking priority standards and identifying the intended depth of learning.

Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

standards unpacking notes; priority standards maps; PLC agendas/minutes showing standards review; teacher-created learning progressions.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStandards & Learning Clarity

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Develop or refine common learning intentions and success criteria for upcoming units so students understand what they are expected to learn and how they will demonstrate mastery.

Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStandards & Learning Clarity

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review lesson plans, walkthrough evidence, and student work samples to determine whether learning intentions and success criteria are being used consistently.

Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Schedule quarterly curriculum checks during PLCs or collaborative team meetings to review pacing, standards alignment, and resource use.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected and analyzed quarterly; summary shared with PLCs/ILT after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use common planning time to compare upcoming instructional materials and assessments to the expectations of the standards.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Adjust unit plans when evidence shows that instruction, resources, or assessments are not fully aligned to grade-level expectations.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Hold vertical team meetings at least two times per year to review how key reading and math standards progress across grade levels.

Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected during fall and spring vertical/team reviews; findings shared with ILT and grade/content teams after each session.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Identify prerequisite skills that students need for upcoming grade-level content and determine where those skills will be reinforced.

Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use student work and assessment data to identify common gaps between grade levels and adjust instructional planning accordingly.

Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review available instructional resources to determine which materials are most aligned to the standards and appropriate for Tier I instruction.

Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Provide teachers with planning support on how to use HQIRs without lowering the rigor of the task or standard.

Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Monitor classroom implementation through walkthroughs, lesson plan reviews, and PLC discussions focused on resource use and student access to grade-level work.

Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use PLCs to review recent assessment results and identify standards where students need reteaching, extension, or additional scaffolding.

Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Plan short-term instructional adjustments based on student evidence, including small groups, targeted practice, or changes to questioning and feedback.

Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Revisit student work after adjustments are made to determine whether students are making progress toward the standard.

Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Identify common barriers that prevent students from accessing grade-level reading and math tasks.

Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Plan scaffolds such as vocabulary support, worked examples, models, sentence stems, manipulatives, or guided practice without changing the expected learning outcome.

Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review disaggregated student work and assessment results to determine whether students receiving supports are still engaging with grade-level standards.

Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Train staff to use the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT) during instructional planning.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)

Who monitors

Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads

Evidence

Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation evidence; OAT guidance or planning tools.

How often

During initial professional learning and follow-up as needed.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Use the OAT in PLCs during unit or cycle planning to review instructional materials.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)

Who monitors

Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads

Evidence

Completed OAT reviews; PLC agendas/minutes; unit or cycle planning artifacts.

How often

During unit or cycle planning in PLCs.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Revise or supplement lessons and materials based on findings from the OAT review.

Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)

Who monitors

Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads

Evidence

Revised or supplemented lessons/materials; follow-up OAT reviews; PLC planning artifacts.

How often

Reviewed during subsequent PLC/unit planning cycles.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Ensure teachers and specialists have required resource materials for their specific content area and grade level.

Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.

Who monitors

Academic/Instructional Coaches & Department Chairs (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Building Principal & District Curriculum Director

Evidence

Physical resource audit checklists for EL (ELA) & IM (Math); Staff resource gap/request forms

How often

Annually (Pre-service in August); Bi-weekly (First month of school)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Remove existing resources not outlined in the local curriculum document as primary or potential supplemental resources from classroom use.

Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.

Who monitors

Building Leadership Team & Grade-Level/Department Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers

Evidence

Classroom inventory checklists; Core curriculum alignment audits

How often

Once per semester (Start of Fall/Spring terms)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveHQIR Implementation

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Ensure all classrooms have the resources required to access any digital components of the HQIR and staff and students have the appropriate credentials to access them.

Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.

Who monitors

Leadership Team; School Technology Lead?; Shares: Principals & Instructional Coaches

Evidence

Account creation/login success logs for EL, IM, and i-Ready; Student device accessibility audits

How often

Weekly during August/September; Monthly ongoing check-ins

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Communicate the locally determined pacing window aligned to guidance provided by the HQIR.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

Content Area Chairs & Instructional Coaches (Collect/Analyze); Shares: PLC Teams & Principal

Evidence

EL and IM year-long pacing guides; Unit pacing map alignment checklists

How often

Monthly pacing audits during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Communicate “non-negotiables” related to use of the HQIR.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: All Certified Staff

Evidence

HQIR implementation non-negotiable matrix; Professional development sign-in sheets

How often

Quarterly review meetings; Annually during pre-service

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Align relevant school-level policies, structures and procedures to support HQIR implementation and increase coherence.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

School Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: SBDM Council & District Leadership

Evidence

Master schedule alignment audit; PLC operational guidelines & SBDM policies

How often

Bi-annually (Beginning and mid-year)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review and Modify Schedules (if necessary) to ensure adequate time for implementation of the HQIR.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

Principal & Assistant Principal; Shares: Grade-Level Teams & District Admin

Evidence

Master schedules reflecting required block lengths (e.g., 90-min EL, 60-min IM); WIN/Intervention schedules

How often

Annually in July/August; Quarterly adjustment check

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review any adjustments to policies, structures and procedures relevant to curriculum implementation.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

SBDM Council & Building Principal; Shares: School Leadership Team & Staff

Evidence

SBDM (policy) minutes; Revised curriculum alignment documentation

How often

Quarterly policy reviews

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review the common observation tool for receiving feedback and relevant indicators related to implementation and instruction.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Principal & Assistant Principals (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Instructional Staff

Evidence

High-yield practice walkthrough rubrics/scoring; Walkthrough alignment & calibration notes

How often

Monthly calibration sessions; Quarterly feedback trends

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Review roles and expectations for implementation and instruction monitoring, including observation, coaching, feedback, and data analysis from formative, interim, and summative assessments, as well as student work.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Who: Leadership Team & Instructional Coaches; Shares: PLC Teams

Evidence

Coaching logs & observation schedule calendar; PLC feedback protocols & assessment calendars

How often

Monthly administrative reviews; Quarterly alignment checks

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Create a process for soliciting and responding to questions or feedback from staff about the implementation of the HQIR.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: PLC Leaders & District Curriculum Team

Evidence

Digital feedback forms / pulse surveys; "Q&A / Feedback" agenda items in PLCs

How often

Bi-weekly during Launch stage; Monthly post-launch

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Communicate key information related to the implementation of the HQIR with students and families.

Strategy: Strengthen communication about HQIR implementation so students, families, and staff understand expectations, changes, and available supports.

Who monitors

Principals & Classroom Teachers; Shares: Parents/Guardians & SBDM Council

Evidence

Parent newsletters, family curriculum nights, and EL/IM family overview letters

How often

Monthly newsletters; Fall & Winter Open House/Nights

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Engage in PL to build understanding of the instructional approach and design of the HQIR, how it aligns to the instructional vision and what strong implementation looks like.

Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.

Who monitors

Instructional Coaches & District Curriculum Lead; Shares: All Certified Teachers

Evidence

Pre/Post PL confidence survey data; Attendance & completion tracking logs

How often

Monthly PL sessions

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Monitor pacing to stay within the locally determined window.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Grade-Level/Department Chairs (Collect); Shares: Principal & Academic Coach

Evidence

EL & IM unit pacing tracker sheets; i-Ready & CERT benchmark testing progress

How often

Bi-weekly in PLCs; 3x per year (Fall, Winter, Spring)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Conduct formal step-backs (quarterly, end of year) to review implementation data and use those discussions to drive improvements in implementation.

Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.

Who monitors

Principal, Leadership Team, & District Admin; Shares: School Community & SBDM

Evidence

Quarterly Step-Back data packets; Revised implementation action plans

How often

Quarterly (Oct, Jan, Mar, June)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCurriculum Alignment

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Clearly communicate what Is and Is Not recommended adjustment of the HQIR (including supplementation).

Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.

Who monitors

District Curriculum Team & Academic Coach; Shares: All Instructional Staff

Evidence

HQIR Flexibility Guidance Matrix; PLC unit planning agendas

How often

Annually (Pre-service); At start of new units

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards

Support the onboarding of new staff by providing guidance on the HQIR and lessons learned from initial implementation.

Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Mentor Teachers; Shares: Principal

Evidence

New teacher onboarding checklist; Mentor/Mentee meeting logs

How often

Monthly during year 1

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Ensure curriculum-based professional learning structures (shared learning workshops, PLCs for intellectual preparation, etc.) are in place.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal & PLC Facilitators; Shares: Academic Coach & District Leadership

Evidence

Master PLC meeting schedules; Dedicated intellectual preparation time logs

How often

Weekly during PLC blocks

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Implement, participate in, and monitor PLCs focused on HQIR implementation.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal, AP, & Academic Coach (Collect); Shares: PLC Teams & District Admin

Evidence

PLC agenda/minutes digital repository; Walkthrough data from PLC observations

How often

Weekly (Minutes review); Monthly (PLC observation summary)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Protect time in the curriculum-based professional learning structures from being used for initiatives unrelated to implementation.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership

Evidence

Approved PLC agendas (audited for focus); Time-allocation feedback logs

How often

Bi-weekly agenda audits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Establish expectation that the approved protocols (e.g., unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal, student work analysis) are used to support intellectual preparation within PLCs.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Grade-Level Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers

Evidence

Completed EL/IM Unit & Lesson Internalization templates?; Student work analysis protocols

How often

Weekly during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide and engage in PL to build understanding of intellectual preparation, beginning with unit internalization, and provide time for PLCs to internalize units.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

District Specialists & Academic Coach; Shares: School Leadership Team

Evidence

Unit internalization artifacts (e.g., annotated EL/IM units); PL evaluation exit tickets

How often

Monthly dedicated sessions; At start of each unit

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Create and execute a PL plan aligned to the implementation goals and set the expectation for required participation.

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: Certified Staff

Evidence

PL attendance records & implementation surveys; Walkthrough indicators of PL application

How often

Monthly PL tracking; Quarterly efficacy reviews

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Engage in shared learning to build understanding of the core processes of intellectual preparation (unit and lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis) using the district-determined protocols.

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Department/Grade-Level Teams

Evidence

Completed student work analysis protocols

How often

Weekly during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Participate in professional learning opportunities that deepen understanding of the HQIR’s instructional design and use in classroom practice.

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

District Curriculum Specialists & Vendors; Shares: Teachers & Building Admin

Evidence

Coaching logs & model classroom visit notes; High-yield walkthrough practice growth metrics

How often

Monthly coaching rounds; Quarterly growth audits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Regularly observe teacher practice and provide feedback on HQIR implementation using a common observational tool (e.g., vendor-specific tool, KDE-provided observation tool).

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Principal, AP, & Academic Coach; Shares: Individual Teachers & Staff

Evidence

Walkthrough tool data (focus on student collaboration & engagement); Coaching feedback email/logs

How often

Weekly (5–10 walks per admin); Bi-weekly individual check-ins

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide professional learning, including coaching, classroom observations, targeted feedback and model classroom visits anchored in the HQIR.

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Master Teachers; Shares: Principal & District Specialists

Evidence

Coaching cycle logs & pre/post observation forms; Peer observation reflection sheets

How often

Bi-weekly coaching cycles; Monthly model classroom visits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use the HQIR as designed and ensure the majority of instruction is spent engaged with the HQIR.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Administrative Team; Shares: Teachers & PLC Teams

Evidence

Walkthrough tool fidelity ratings (EL/IM adherence); Daily schedule / time-on-task checks

How often

Weekly walkthroughs; Monthly trend reporting

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use HQIR-embedded supports to ensure all students can engage in grade-level work.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

ECE Lead, ELL Teachers, & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal

Evidence

Lesson plan audits (scaffolds/accommodations); i-Ready diagnostic tier movement (K–8); CERT subgroup performance (HS)

How often

Weekly during PLC planning; 3x per year post-diagnostics

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Document if/when the HQIR resources may need refinement (e.g., for alignment to the KAS) and communicate with school/district leaders.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Department Chairs & Academic Coach; Shares: District Curriculum Director

Evidence

HQIR refinement log / feedback form; KAS alignment gap documentation

How often

Monthly submission to district

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Co-observe classrooms with district leaders.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Building Admin & District Supervisors; Shares: Observed Teachers

Evidence

Co-observation calibration notes; Walkthrough tool data validity reports

How often

Quarterly co-observation rounds

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntellectual Preparation & PLCs

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Observe PLCs and provide feedback on intellectual preparation (unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis).

Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.

Who monitors

Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators

Evidence

PLC observation rubric & feedback notes; Intellectual prep artifact quality checks

How often

Bi-weekly PLC observations

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide ongoing opportunities for teachers to develop leadership capacities, including classroom practice specific to HQIR implementation and facilitating intellectual preparation in PLCs.

Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.

Who monitors

Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: Leadership Council

Evidence

Lead Teacher / PLC Facilitator training logs; Peer coaching debrief forms

How often

Monthly teacher leader meetings

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Sustain a collaborative environment where professional learning communities use their collective strengths, skills and experience to improve classroom practice related to HQIR implementation.

Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.

Who monitors

PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Building Principal

Evidence

PLC peer feedback forms & self-evaluations; Collaborative unit plans

How often

Weekly (PLCs); Quarterly culture audits

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Engage with school leaders in identifying personal targets for feedback and support.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers & Instructional Coach; Shares: Principal (PGP alignment)

Evidence

Professional Growth Plans (PGPs); Coaching goal tracking logs

How often

Bi-annually (Fall target set, Spring review)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveProfessional Learning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Develop and execute a district-aligned professional learning plan that addresses teacher needs related to HQIR implementation and making adjustments to the curriculum. LE COMMENT: Slightly abridged

Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.

Who monitors

District Curriculum Director & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff

Evidence

District PL completion reports; Classroom walkthrough implementation trends

How often

Quarterly progress reports

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide feedback to teachers on the facilitation of intellectual prep within PLCs and on skillful use of HQIR in classrooms to meet students’ diverse learning needs.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators & Teachers

Evidence

Walkthrough tool reports (differentiation/talk focus); PLC feedback summary forms

How often

Bi-weekly walkthrough notes; Monthly coaching meetings

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCoaching & Feedback

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Establish time for reflection on the ways in which teachers use HQIR to support diverse learning needs through curriculum embedded supports. Provide opportunities for teachers to observe each other’s practice and share feedback.

Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Teachers; Shares: Grade-Level Teams

Evidence

Peer observation reflection forms; EL/IM scaffolding utilization logs

How often

1x per semester per teacher

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Make smart adjustments to the HQIR using information about students’ needs and performance.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC Teams & Interventionists; Shares: Academic Coach & AP

Evidence

i-Ready grouping & flexible rotation rosters; WIN block intervention schedules

How often

Bi-weekly in PLCs; Every 3 weeks (MTSS check)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Purposefully leverage scaffolds within the HQIR to support all students in accessing grade-level learning and reaching unit and lesson goals.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers & Interventionists; Shares: PLC Teams

Evidence

Scaffolding logs (graphic organizers, sentence frames); Walkthrough tool data on student participation

How often

Weekly during lesson prep; Weekly walkthroughs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Purposefully plan connections to students’ backgrounds and experiences to enhance relevance in the classroom environment.

Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers; Shares: PLC Teams & Leadership

Evidence

Student interest inventory results; Culturally responsive lesson plans

How often

At start of each EL/IM unit

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Identify two schoolwide culturally responsive instructional practices from the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT).

Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Selected schoolwide practices and OAT review evidence.

How often

At the start of the implementation cycle; revisit as needed.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Introduce and model the selected practices during staff meetings, PLCs, or Gold Days.

Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Meeting/PL agendas, modeling materials, staff participation artifacts.

How often

During planned staff learning sessions.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Plan for and use the selected practices during instruction.

Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Walkthrough evidence aligned to the selected practices; disaggregated implementation results; coaching notes.

How often

Monthly walkthrough review; quarterly trend review.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide professional learning on culturally responsive teaching, implicit bias, and inclusive practices.

Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation and reflection artifacts.

How often

At planned professional learning sessions.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Identify two or three inclusive instructional strategies for staff to apply in instruction.

Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Selected strategy list; lesson/planning artifacts; walkthrough evidence.

How often

Reviewed monthly through planning/walkthrough evidence.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide time for reflection, collaboration, and coaching connected to the selected strategies.

Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)

Who monitors

Admin team and instructional coach

Evidence

Staff reflections, meeting agendas, coaching notes, and follow-up walkthrough evidence.

How often

Quarterly reflection and coaching review.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use a common lesson planning protocol that includes standards, learning intentions, success criteria, checks for understanding, and planned scaffolds.

Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Conduct regular walkthroughs focused on evidence of clear learning expectations and student access to grade-level work.

Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use PLC time to revise upcoming lessons based on student needs and evidence from prior instruction.

Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide professional learning on instructional practices such as modeling, questioning, academic discussion, feedback, and gradual release.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Have teachers plan specific opportunities for students to explain reasoning, discuss ideas, revise work, or justify answers.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveTier I Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use peer observation, coaching, or walkthrough feedback to support implementation of the selected instructional practices.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Develop a walkthrough focus connected to the school’s instructional priority, such as success criteria, questioning, student discourse, or feedback.

Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Share walkthrough trends with teachers during PLCs, staff meetings, or coaching conversations.

Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use the trends to identify specific instructional adjustments and follow up to determine whether the adjustments are evident in classrooms.

Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Teach students how to use success criteria, rubrics, checklists, or exemplars to assess their own progress.

Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Build in regular student reflection or goal-setting opportunities connected to academic, behavior, or attendance data.

Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Provide time for students to revise work based on feedback and explain what they changed and why.

Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use exit tickets, student work, formative checks, or common assessments to identify students who need additional support or extension.

Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Regroup students for short-term support based on the specific skill or standard being addressed.

Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Review follow-up evidence to determine whether the instructional adjustment improved student understanding.

Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Review lesson tasks for opportunities to connect content to student interests, real-world issues, cultural connections, or meaningful problem-solving.

Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Gather student feedback on engagement, belonging, and access to learning tasks.

Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulturally Responsive Instruction

KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction

Use feedback and classroom evidence to adjust instructional examples, texts, tasks, or discussion structures.

Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Analyze student work from HQIR-embedded assessments to identify strengths and gaps in student learning.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of HQIR-embedded assessments and student work so teachers identify strengths, gaps, and next instructional steps.

Who monitors

Classroom Teachers & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal

Evidence

EL module assessments & IM end-of-unit tests; Standardized student work rubric scores

How often

Bi-weekly during PLC cycles

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Communicate schoolwide expectations for assessment, grading, feedback, revision, and communication of student progress to families.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Schoolwide assessment/grading expectations; communication materials; evidence of consistent implementation.

How often

Reviewed at the beginning of the year and periodically during PLC cycles.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Provide professional learning on using success criteria to determine student progress.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Professional learning artifacts; success criteria; student work showing use of criteria.

How often

During PLC/professional learning cycles.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop, review, and refine common assessments in PLCs to ensure alignment to grade-level standards and intended rigor.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Common assessments; alignment reviews; PLC notes; assessment revisions.

How often

Monthly or during assessment development/review cycles.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Use student work and assessment data to plan feedback, revision, reteaching, and next instructional steps.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Common assessment data; student work; evidence of feedback/revision; reteaching plans; disaggregated diagnostic/assessment data.

How often

After each assessment window and during PLC cycles.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review and revise the school’s grading system through PLC and administrative team discussions.

Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)

Who monitors

PLCs and admin team

Evidence

Grading practices/policies; PLC and administrative team notes; evidence of revisions.

How often

Quarterly.

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Systems

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Create or review the school’s assessment calendar to identify when each type of assessment is used and what decision it informs.

Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Systems

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review assessments during PLCs to check alignment to standards, learning intentions, and success criteria.

Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Systems

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Clarify how teachers will use assessment results for reteaching, regrouping, enrichment, intervention, or progress monitoring.

Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Provide professional learning on assessment alignment, item/task rigor, success criteria, and common scoring expectations.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Have teams review assessment items or tasks before administration to determine whether they match the standard and expected depth of knowledge.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Literacy

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Revise or replace assessment items that do not provide useful evidence of student mastery.

Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop common expectations for how success criteria will be shared, referenced, and used during instruction.

Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Plan opportunities for students to receive feedback tied directly to the success criteria.

Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review student work samples to determine whether feedback is helping students improve the quality of their work.

Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Use a common student work analysis protocol during PLCs or collaborative team meetings.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Sort student work by level of mastery and identify patterns in misconceptions or unfinished learning.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Work & Data Analysis

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Plan instructional responses based on the evidence and revisit student work after reteaching or additional support.

Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Review current grading practices to identify inconsistencies across classrooms or teams.

Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop common expectations for grading standards-based tasks, reassessment, missing work, and feedback.

Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFeedback, Revision & Grading

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Compare grading evidence with student work and assessment results to determine whether grades reflect demonstrated learning.

Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Communication

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Develop a consistent process for sharing assessment information with students and families in clear, understandable language.

Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Communication

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Include specific next steps when communicating academic progress, such as skills to practice, supports available, or upcoming reassessment opportunities.

Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment Communication

KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy

Use family/student feedback to determine whether assessment communication is understandable and useful.

Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Set implementation goals, collect data aligned to implementation goals (e.g., from instructional walks, PLC work/observations, student work), and analyze data to effectively support reflection and decision-making at the school level.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.

Who monitors

Leadership Team & Academic Coach; Shares: Whole Staff & District Office

Evidence

High-yield walkthrough tool data dashboards; PLC observation logs & student work protocols

How often

Monthly leadership reviews; Quarterly step-back meetings

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Engage in reflection on the impact of the curriculum and HQIR on students.

Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.

Who monitors

PLC Teams & Guidance Counselors; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership

Evidence

i-Ready Growth Reports (K–8); CERT score trends (HS); Student focus group feedback

How often

3x per year (i-Ready/CERT Windows); Monthly during PLCs

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Establish a recurring data meeting schedule for PLCs, grade-level teams, or intervention teams.

Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Use a common data protocol to identify strengths, concerns, root causes, and next steps.

Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Identify where gaps exist in performance, participation, placement, intervention, advanced coursework, or discipline outcomes.

Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Select specific actions to address the gaps and monitor whether those actions improve outcomes over time.

Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review formative and interim data shortly after assessments are administered.

Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Identify standards or skills where students need reteaching, extension, or additional practice.

Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAssessment-Informed Planning

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Plan and implement short-cycle instructional responses, then review follow-up evidence to check for improvement.

Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review multiple data sources before placing students in interventions, enrichment, or other supports.

Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Establish clear criteria for entering, adjusting, or exiting supports.

Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Monitor student progress regularly to ensure students are receiving the right level of support.

Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Provide students with age-appropriate data reflection tools or goal-setting templates.

Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Schedule regular student conferences or reflection opportunities focused on progress and next steps.

Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveStudent Engagement & Ownership

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Teach students how to connect their effort, strategies, attendance, and behavior to learning outcomes.

Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review multiple data sources during leadership team meetings, including assessment results, walkthrough trends, attendance, behavior, survey data, and intervention data.

Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Identify whether current programs or supports are producing the intended results for all student groups.

Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Adjust resources, schedules, professional learning, or support structures based on the evidence reviewed.

Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Map current supports across academics, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional learning to identify overlaps, gaps, or unclear processes.

Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Develop clear referral, intervention, and follow-up procedures for students needing additional support.

Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review support data regularly to determine whether students are receiving timely and appropriate assistance.

Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use screening and diagnostic data to identify specific student needs before assigning interventions.

Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Match students to interventions based on the skill, behavior, attendance pattern, or support need identified.

Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review progress monitoring data at scheduled intervals to determine whether to continue, adjust, intensify, or exit the intervention.

Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Define what full implementation of each intervention or support should look like, including frequency, duration, and responsible staff.

Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use documentation logs, intervention records, or fidelity checks to monitor whether supports are being delivered as intended.

Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSupport System Alignment

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Provide follow-up support to staff when implementation evidence shows inconsistency.

Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review school schedules to determine whether intervention, enrichment, and support time are protected and accessible.

Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use student need data to assign staff, materials, and support time where they are most needed.

Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Monitor whether students from all groups have access to the supports and opportunities intended for them.

Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveOpportunity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review participation data by student group for advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE, or other rigorous opportunities.

Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveOpportunity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Identify barriers that may limit access, such as referral practices, prerequisites, scheduling, communication, or student/family awareness.

Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveOpportunity & Access

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Adjust identification, communication, scheduling, or support processes to increase equitable participation.

Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveContinuous Improvement

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Use tools such as root cause analysis, PDSA cycles, or problem-solving protocols to examine support system concerns.

Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveContinuous Improvement

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Select a specific adjustment to test, such as a revised referral process, attendance intervention, or progress monitoring routine.

Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveContinuous Improvement

KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes

Review implementation and outcome data to determine whether the adjustment should be continued, revised, or stopped.

Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review and respond to questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data from surveys, focus groups, etc.

Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.

Who monitors

Leadership Team & SBDM Council; Shares: Whole Staff

Evidence

Anonymous staff implementation climate surveys; Focus group feedback summary sheets

How often

Mid-year (December); End-of-year (May)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Respond to the questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data gathered from surveys, focus groups, etc.

Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.

Who monitors

Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff

Evidence

Climate & Culture Survey results; Action item follow-up memos

How often

Bi-annually (Nov/April)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Communicate the instructional vision and belief that all students can be successful with rigorous, grade-level work.

Strategy: Build a shared instructional culture by consistently communicating high expectations and the belief that all students can succeed with rigorous, grade-level work.

Who monitors

Principal & SBDM Council; Shares: Staff, Students, & Parents

Evidence

Principal messages, staff bulletin items, and vision posters; Student survey results

How often

Monthly communications; Quarterly assemblies?

IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Define common expectations for classroom routines, relationships, student discussion, and respectful interactions.

Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Conduct walkthroughs or classroom visits focused on evidence of belonging, engagement, and student willingness to participate.

Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.

Evidence

walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Use student feedback and classroom evidence to identify where additional support is needed.

Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveBehavior Supports

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Teach, model, and practice schoolwide behavior expectations and routines throughout the year.

Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Implementation checked during the first 30 days and revisited monthly; trends shared during monthly staff/ILT meetings.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveBehavior Supports

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review behavior and referral data to identify common locations, times, or expectations needing reteaching.

Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveBehavior Supports

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Provide staff with consistent procedures for responding to behavior concerns and reinforcing positive behavior.

Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Use PLCs or collaborative teams to review student learning, behavior, attendance, and engagement data.

Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Identify shared adult actions that can be implemented across classrooms or teams.

Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveCulture & Climate

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Revisit results to determine whether the shared actions are improving student outcomes.

Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSEL & Self-Management

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Teach SEL and self-management skills through advisory, morning meetings, classroom routines, or explicit lessons.

Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSEL & Self-Management

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Provide students with tools for goal setting, reflection, conflict resolution, and responsible decision-making.

Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveSEL & Self-Management

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Monitor behavior, attendance, and classroom engagement data to determine whether SEL practices are supporting improved outcomes.

Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Communicate school expectations, academic supports, attendance information, and behavior supports in family-friendly language.

Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Identify community partners who can support attendance, mentoring, enrichment, basic needs, or family engagement.

Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveFamily & Community Partnerships

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review family feedback and participation data to determine whether communication and partnership efforts are reaching families effectively.

Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.

How often

Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAuthentic Learning

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Plan tasks that require students to apply learning, explain thinking, solve problems, or connect content to real-world situations.

Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAuthentic Learning

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Build in classroom routines that normalize mistakes, revision, and productive struggle.

Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.

Evidence

student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveAuthentic Learning

KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture

Review student work and engagement evidence to determine whether students are participating in meaningful, appropriately challenging learning experiences.

Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29

ReadingReading ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Document agreed-upon instructional or support responses and revisit the data to determine whether the response worked.

Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Set yearly implementation goals and develop an aligned monitoring plan.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.

Who monitors

Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: Staff, SBDM, & District Admin

Evidence

Annual CSIP / Implementation Plan; Key Performance Indicator (KPI) dashboard

How often

Annually (June/July planning)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveImplementation Monitoring

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Utilize the school leadership team to own gathering, organizing and using data and feedback to drive implementation improvements. Continue to use data from formal stepbacks (quarterly, end of year), celebrate “bright spots” to elevate evidence of HQIR’s instructional impact and to identify challenges to potentially refine the implementation plan.

Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.

Who monitors

School Leadership Team; Shares: Whole Staff & SBDM Council

Evidence

i-Ready (K–8), CERT (HS), and KSA data analysis packets; Bright spots and challenge reports

How often

3x per year (Post i-Ready/CERT); Annually (Post KSA release)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Continue to participate in learning opportunities and data conversations that help deepen understanding of the HQIR and its instructional shifts.

Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.

Who monitors

Academic Coach & Department Chairs; Shares: Certified Teachers

Evidence

Advanced EL/IM workshop attendance; Student engagement walkthrough data

How often

Monthly PLCs; Quarterly district PL

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Collect, analyze, and use data from HQIM-embedded assessments to drive the school-specific assessment strategy and implementation improvements.

Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.

Who monitors

PLC Teams & Data Specialist; Shares: Principal & MTSS Team

Evidence

EL Module & IM Unit mastery charts; i-Ready prerequisite / growth reports

How often

Bi-weekly (Unit assessments); 3x per year (Diagnostics)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveIntervention & MTSS

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Regularly analyze student work and curriculum-embedded assessments to determine student needs and provide aligned intervention as needed.

Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.

Who monitors

MTSS/Tier II Team & PLC Groups; Shares: Principal & District Coordinator

Evidence

i-Ready progress monitoring probes (K–8); CERT skill-gap tracking (HS); Tier II/III intervention rosters

How often

Weekly/Bi-weekly (Probes); Monthly (MTSS Data Reviews)

IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveData-Based Decision Making

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Document agreed-upon instructional or support responses and revisit the data to determine whether the response worked.

Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.

Who monitors

Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.

Evidence

implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.

How often

Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26

MathematicsMathematics ObjectiveEquity & Access

KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data

Review academic, behavior, attendance, and access data by student group during scheduled leadership or PLC meetings.

Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.

Who monitors

PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.

Evidence

PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.

How often

Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.

IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26