JCPS School Improvement Planning
CSIP Activity Database
Start with the school’s CSIP goal. Filters on this page are private and never change another person’s results.
Available activities
Showing 348 of 348 activities
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Conduct grade-level or content-area standards review sessions focused on unpacking priority standards and identifying the intended depth of learning.
Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
standards unpacking notes; priority standards maps; PLC agendas/minutes showing standards review; teacher-created learning progressions.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Develop or refine common learning intentions and success criteria for upcoming units so students understand what they are expected to learn and how they will demonstrate mastery.
Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review lesson plans, walkthrough evidence, and student work samples to determine whether learning intentions and success criteria are being used consistently.
Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Schedule quarterly curriculum checks during PLCs or collaborative team meetings to review pacing, standards alignment, and resource use.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected and analyzed quarterly; summary shared with PLCs/ILT after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use common planning time to compare upcoming instructional materials and assessments to the expectations of the standards.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Adjust unit plans when evidence shows that instruction, resources, or assessments are not fully aligned to grade-level expectations.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Hold vertical team meetings at least two times per year to review how key reading and math standards progress across grade levels.
Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected during fall and spring vertical/team reviews; findings shared with ILT and grade/content teams after each session.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Identify prerequisite skills that students need for upcoming grade-level content and determine where those skills will be reinforced.
Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use student work and assessment data to identify common gaps between grade levels and adjust instructional planning accordingly.
Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review available instructional resources to determine which materials are most aligned to the standards and appropriate for Tier I instruction.
Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Provide teachers with planning support on how to use HQIRs without lowering the rigor of the task or standard.
Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Monitor classroom implementation through walkthroughs, lesson plan reviews, and PLC discussions focused on resource use and student access to grade-level work.
Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use PLCs to review recent assessment results and identify standards where students need reteaching, extension, or additional scaffolding.
Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Plan short-term instructional adjustments based on student evidence, including small groups, targeted practice, or changes to questioning and feedback.
Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Revisit student work after adjustments are made to determine whether students are making progress toward the standard.
Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Identify common barriers that prevent students from accessing grade-level reading and math tasks.
Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Plan scaffolds such as vocabulary support, worked examples, models, sentence stems, manipulatives, or guided practice without changing the expected learning outcome.
Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review disaggregated student work and assessment results to determine whether students receiving supports are still engaging with grade-level standards.
Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Train staff to use the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT) during instructional planning.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)
Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads
Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation evidence; OAT guidance or planning tools.
During initial professional learning and follow-up as needed.
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use the OAT in PLCs during unit or cycle planning to review instructional materials.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)
Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads
Completed OAT reviews; PLC agendas/minutes; unit or cycle planning artifacts.
During unit or cycle planning in PLCs.
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Revise or supplement lessons and materials based on findings from the OAT review.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)
Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads
Revised or supplemented lessons/materials; follow-up OAT reviews; PLC planning artifacts.
Reviewed during subsequent PLC/unit planning cycles.
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Ensure teachers and specialists have required resource materials for their specific content area and grade level.
Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.
Academic/Instructional Coaches & Department Chairs (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Building Principal & District Curriculum Director
Physical resource audit checklists for EL (ELA) & IM (Math); Staff resource gap/request forms
Annually (Pre-service in August); Bi-weekly (First month of school)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Remove existing resources not outlined in the local curriculum document as primary or potential supplemental resources from classroom use.
Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.
Building Leadership Team & Grade-Level/Department Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers
Classroom inventory checklists; Core curriculum alignment audits
Once per semester (Start of Fall/Spring terms)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Ensure all classrooms have the resources required to access any digital components of the HQIR and staff and students have the appropriate credentials to access them.
Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.
Leadership Team; School Technology Lead?; Shares: Principals & Instructional Coaches
Account creation/login success logs for EL, IM, and i-Ready; Student device accessibility audits
Weekly during August/September; Monthly ongoing check-ins
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Communicate the locally determined pacing window aligned to guidance provided by the HQIR.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
Content Area Chairs & Instructional Coaches (Collect/Analyze); Shares: PLC Teams & Principal
EL and IM year-long pacing guides; Unit pacing map alignment checklists
Monthly pacing audits during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Communicate “non-negotiables” related to use of the HQIR.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: All Certified Staff
HQIR implementation non-negotiable matrix; Professional development sign-in sheets
Quarterly review meetings; Annually during pre-service
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Align relevant school-level policies, structures and procedures to support HQIR implementation and increase coherence.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
School Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: SBDM Council & District Leadership
Master schedule alignment audit; PLC operational guidelines & SBDM policies
Bi-annually (Beginning and mid-year)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review and Modify Schedules (if necessary) to ensure adequate time for implementation of the HQIR.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
Principal & Assistant Principal; Shares: Grade-Level Teams & District Admin
Master schedules reflecting required block lengths (e.g., 90-min EL, 60-min IM); WIN/Intervention schedules
Annually in July/August; Quarterly adjustment check
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review any adjustments to policies, structures and procedures relevant to curriculum implementation.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
SBDM Council & Building Principal; Shares: School Leadership Team & Staff
SBDM (policy) minutes; Revised curriculum alignment documentation
Quarterly policy reviews
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review the common observation tool for receiving feedback and relevant indicators related to implementation and instruction.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Principal & Assistant Principals (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Instructional Staff
High-yield practice walkthrough rubrics/scoring; Walkthrough alignment & calibration notes
Monthly calibration sessions; Quarterly feedback trends
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review roles and expectations for implementation and instruction monitoring, including observation, coaching, feedback, and data analysis from formative, interim, and summative assessments, as well as student work.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Who: Leadership Team & Instructional Coaches; Shares: PLC Teams
Coaching logs & observation schedule calendar; PLC feedback protocols & assessment calendars
Monthly administrative reviews; Quarterly alignment checks
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Create a process for soliciting and responding to questions or feedback from staff about the implementation of the HQIR.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: PLC Leaders & District Curriculum Team
Digital feedback forms / pulse surveys; "Q&A / Feedback" agenda items in PLCs
Bi-weekly during Launch stage; Monthly post-launch
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Communicate key information related to the implementation of the HQIR with students and families.
Strategy: Strengthen communication about HQIR implementation so students, families, and staff understand expectations, changes, and available supports.
Principals & Classroom Teachers; Shares: Parents/Guardians & SBDM Council
Parent newsletters, family curriculum nights, and EL/IM family overview letters
Monthly newsletters; Fall & Winter Open House/Nights
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Engage in PL to build understanding of the instructional approach and design of the HQIR, how it aligns to the instructional vision and what strong implementation looks like.
Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.
Instructional Coaches & District Curriculum Lead; Shares: All Certified Teachers
Pre/Post PL confidence survey data; Attendance & completion tracking logs
Monthly PL sessions
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Monitor pacing to stay within the locally determined window.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Grade-Level/Department Chairs (Collect); Shares: Principal & Academic Coach
EL & IM unit pacing tracker sheets; i-Ready & CERT benchmark testing progress
Bi-weekly in PLCs; 3x per year (Fall, Winter, Spring)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Conduct formal step-backs (quarterly, end of year) to review implementation data and use those discussions to drive improvements in implementation.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Principal, Leadership Team, & District Admin; Shares: School Community & SBDM
Quarterly Step-Back data packets; Revised implementation action plans
Quarterly (Oct, Jan, Mar, June)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Clearly communicate what Is and Is Not recommended adjustment of the HQIR (including supplementation).
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
District Curriculum Team & Academic Coach; Shares: All Instructional Staff
HQIR Flexibility Guidance Matrix; PLC unit planning agendas
Annually (Pre-service); At start of new units
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Support the onboarding of new staff by providing guidance on the HQIR and lessons learned from initial implementation.
Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.
Academic Coach & Mentor Teachers; Shares: Principal
New teacher onboarding checklist; Mentor/Mentee meeting logs
Monthly during year 1
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Ensure curriculum-based professional learning structures (shared learning workshops, PLCs for intellectual preparation, etc.) are in place.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal & PLC Facilitators; Shares: Academic Coach & District Leadership
Master PLC meeting schedules; Dedicated intellectual preparation time logs
Weekly during PLC blocks
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Implement, participate in, and monitor PLCs focused on HQIR implementation.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal, AP, & Academic Coach (Collect); Shares: PLC Teams & District Admin
PLC agenda/minutes digital repository; Walkthrough data from PLC observations
Weekly (Minutes review); Monthly (PLC observation summary)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Protect time in the curriculum-based professional learning structures from being used for initiatives unrelated to implementation.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership
Approved PLC agendas (audited for focus); Time-allocation feedback logs
Bi-weekly agenda audits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Establish expectation that the approved protocols (e.g., unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal, student work analysis) are used to support intellectual preparation within PLCs.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Academic Coach & Grade-Level Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers
Completed EL/IM Unit & Lesson Internalization templates?; Student work analysis protocols
Weekly during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide and engage in PL to build understanding of intellectual preparation, beginning with unit internalization, and provide time for PLCs to internalize units.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
District Specialists & Academic Coach; Shares: School Leadership Team
Unit internalization artifacts (e.g., annotated EL/IM units); PL evaluation exit tickets
Monthly dedicated sessions; At start of each unit
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Create and execute a PL plan aligned to the implementation goals and set the expectation for required participation.
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: Certified Staff
PL attendance records & implementation surveys; Walkthrough indicators of PL application
Monthly PL tracking; Quarterly efficacy reviews
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Engage in shared learning to build understanding of the core processes of intellectual preparation (unit and lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis) using the district-determined protocols.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Department/Grade-Level Teams
Completed student work analysis protocols
Weekly during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Participate in professional learning opportunities that deepen understanding of the HQIR’s instructional design and use in classroom practice.
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
District Curriculum Specialists & Vendors; Shares: Teachers & Building Admin
Coaching logs & model classroom visit notes; High-yield walkthrough practice growth metrics
Monthly coaching rounds; Quarterly growth audits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Regularly observe teacher practice and provide feedback on HQIR implementation using a common observational tool (e.g., vendor-specific tool, KDE-provided observation tool).
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Principal, AP, & Academic Coach; Shares: Individual Teachers & Staff
Walkthrough tool data (focus on student collaboration & engagement); Coaching feedback email/logs
Weekly (5–10 walks per admin); Bi-weekly individual check-ins
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide professional learning, including coaching, classroom observations, targeted feedback and model classroom visits anchored in the HQIR.
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
Academic Coach & Master Teachers; Shares: Principal & District Specialists
Coaching cycle logs & pre/post observation forms; Peer observation reflection sheets
Bi-weekly coaching cycles; Monthly model classroom visits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use the HQIR as designed and ensure the majority of instruction is spent engaged with the HQIR.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Administrative Team; Shares: Teachers & PLC Teams
Walkthrough tool fidelity ratings (EL/IM adherence); Daily schedule / time-on-task checks
Weekly walkthroughs; Monthly trend reporting
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use HQIR-embedded supports to ensure all students can engage in grade-level work.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
ECE Lead, ELL Teachers, & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal
Lesson plan audits (scaffolds/accommodations); i-Ready diagnostic tier movement (K–8); CERT subgroup performance (HS)
Weekly during PLC planning; 3x per year post-diagnostics
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Document if/when the HQIR resources may need refinement (e.g., for alignment to the KAS) and communicate with school/district leaders.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Department Chairs & Academic Coach; Shares: District Curriculum Director
HQIR refinement log / feedback form; KAS alignment gap documentation
Monthly submission to district
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Co-observe classrooms with district leaders.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Building Admin & District Supervisors; Shares: Observed Teachers
Co-observation calibration notes; Walkthrough tool data validity reports
Quarterly co-observation rounds
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Observe PLCs and provide feedback on intellectual preparation (unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis).
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators
PLC observation rubric & feedback notes; Intellectual prep artifact quality checks
Bi-weekly PLC observations
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide ongoing opportunities for teachers to develop leadership capacities, including classroom practice specific to HQIR implementation and facilitating intellectual preparation in PLCs.
Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.
Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: Leadership Council
Lead Teacher / PLC Facilitator training logs; Peer coaching debrief forms
Monthly teacher leader meetings
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Sustain a collaborative environment where professional learning communities use their collective strengths, skills and experience to improve classroom practice related to HQIR implementation.
Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.
PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Building Principal
PLC peer feedback forms & self-evaluations; Collaborative unit plans
Weekly (PLCs); Quarterly culture audits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Engage with school leaders in identifying personal targets for feedback and support.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Classroom Teachers & Instructional Coach; Shares: Principal (PGP alignment)
Professional Growth Plans (PGPs); Coaching goal tracking logs
Bi-annually (Fall target set, Spring review)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Develop and execute a district-aligned professional learning plan that addresses teacher needs related to HQIR implementation and making adjustments to the curriculum. LE COMMENT: Slightly abridged
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
District Curriculum Director & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff
District PL completion reports; Classroom walkthrough implementation trends
Quarterly progress reports
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide feedback to teachers on the facilitation of intellectual prep within PLCs and on skillful use of HQIR in classrooms to meet students’ diverse learning needs.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators & Teachers
Walkthrough tool reports (differentiation/talk focus); PLC feedback summary forms
Bi-weekly walkthrough notes; Monthly coaching meetings
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Establish time for reflection on the ways in which teachers use HQIR to support diverse learning needs through curriculum embedded supports. Provide opportunities for teachers to observe each other’s practice and share feedback.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Academic Coach & Teachers; Shares: Grade-Level Teams
Peer observation reflection forms; EL/IM scaffolding utilization logs
1x per semester per teacher
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Make smart adjustments to the HQIR using information about students’ needs and performance.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
PLC Teams & Interventionists; Shares: Academic Coach & AP
i-Ready grouping & flexible rotation rosters; WIN block intervention schedules
Bi-weekly in PLCs; Every 3 weeks (MTSS check)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Purposefully leverage scaffolds within the HQIR to support all students in accessing grade-level learning and reaching unit and lesson goals.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Classroom Teachers & Interventionists; Shares: PLC Teams
Scaffolding logs (graphic organizers, sentence frames); Walkthrough tool data on student participation
Weekly during lesson prep; Weekly walkthroughs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Purposefully plan connections to students’ backgrounds and experiences to enhance relevance in the classroom environment.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Classroom Teachers; Shares: PLC Teams & Leadership
Student interest inventory results; Culturally responsive lesson plans
At start of each EL/IM unit
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Identify two schoolwide culturally responsive instructional practices from the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT).
Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)
Admin team and instructional coach
Selected schoolwide practices and OAT review evidence.
At the start of the implementation cycle; revisit as needed.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Introduce and model the selected practices during staff meetings, PLCs, or Gold Days.
Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)
Admin team and instructional coach
Meeting/PL agendas, modeling materials, staff participation artifacts.
During planned staff learning sessions.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Plan for and use the selected practices during instruction.
Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)
Admin team and instructional coach
Walkthrough evidence aligned to the selected practices; disaggregated implementation results; coaching notes.
Monthly walkthrough review; quarterly trend review.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide professional learning on culturally responsive teaching, implicit bias, and inclusive practices.
Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)
Admin team and instructional coach
Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation and reflection artifacts.
At planned professional learning sessions.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Identify two or three inclusive instructional strategies for staff to apply in instruction.
Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)
Admin team and instructional coach
Selected strategy list; lesson/planning artifacts; walkthrough evidence.
Reviewed monthly through planning/walkthrough evidence.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide time for reflection, collaboration, and coaching connected to the selected strategies.
Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)
Admin team and instructional coach
Staff reflections, meeting agendas, coaching notes, and follow-up walkthrough evidence.
Quarterly reflection and coaching review.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use a common lesson planning protocol that includes standards, learning intentions, success criteria, checks for understanding, and planned scaffolds.
Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Conduct regular walkthroughs focused on evidence of clear learning expectations and student access to grade-level work.
Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use PLC time to revise upcoming lessons based on student needs and evidence from prior instruction.
Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide professional learning on instructional practices such as modeling, questioning, academic discussion, feedback, and gradual release.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Have teachers plan specific opportunities for students to explain reasoning, discuss ideas, revise work, or justify answers.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use peer observation, coaching, or walkthrough feedback to support implementation of the selected instructional practices.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Develop a walkthrough focus connected to the school’s instructional priority, such as success criteria, questioning, student discourse, or feedback.
Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Share walkthrough trends with teachers during PLCs, staff meetings, or coaching conversations.
Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use the trends to identify specific instructional adjustments and follow up to determine whether the adjustments are evident in classrooms.
Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Teach students how to use success criteria, rubrics, checklists, or exemplars to assess their own progress.
Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Build in regular student reflection or goal-setting opportunities connected to academic, behavior, or attendance data.
Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide time for students to revise work based on feedback and explain what they changed and why.
Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use exit tickets, student work, formative checks, or common assessments to identify students who need additional support or extension.
Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Regroup students for short-term support based on the specific skill or standard being addressed.
Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Review follow-up evidence to determine whether the instructional adjustment improved student understanding.
Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Review lesson tasks for opportunities to connect content to student interests, real-world issues, cultural connections, or meaningful problem-solving.
Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Gather student feedback on engagement, belonging, and access to learning tasks.
Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use feedback and classroom evidence to adjust instructional examples, texts, tasks, or discussion structures.
Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Analyze student work from HQIR-embedded assessments to identify strengths and gaps in student learning.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of HQIR-embedded assessments and student work so teachers identify strengths, gaps, and next instructional steps.
Classroom Teachers & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal
EL module assessments & IM end-of-unit tests; Standardized student work rubric scores
Bi-weekly during PLC cycles
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Communicate schoolwide expectations for assessment, grading, feedback, revision, and communication of student progress to families.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Schoolwide assessment/grading expectations; communication materials; evidence of consistent implementation.
Reviewed at the beginning of the year and periodically during PLC cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Provide professional learning on using success criteria to determine student progress.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Professional learning artifacts; success criteria; student work showing use of criteria.
During PLC/professional learning cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop, review, and refine common assessments in PLCs to ensure alignment to grade-level standards and intended rigor.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Common assessments; alignment reviews; PLC notes; assessment revisions.
Monthly or during assessment development/review cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Use student work and assessment data to plan feedback, revision, reteaching, and next instructional steps.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Common assessment data; student work; evidence of feedback/revision; reteaching plans; disaggregated diagnostic/assessment data.
After each assessment window and during PLC cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review and revise the school’s grading system through PLC and administrative team discussions.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Grading practices/policies; PLC and administrative team notes; evidence of revisions.
Quarterly.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Create or review the school’s assessment calendar to identify when each type of assessment is used and what decision it informs.
Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review assessments during PLCs to check alignment to standards, learning intentions, and success criteria.
Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Clarify how teachers will use assessment results for reteaching, regrouping, enrichment, intervention, or progress monitoring.
Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Provide professional learning on assessment alignment, item/task rigor, success criteria, and common scoring expectations.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Have teams review assessment items or tasks before administration to determine whether they match the standard and expected depth of knowledge.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Revise or replace assessment items that do not provide useful evidence of student mastery.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop common expectations for how success criteria will be shared, referenced, and used during instruction.
Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Plan opportunities for students to receive feedback tied directly to the success criteria.
Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review student work samples to determine whether feedback is helping students improve the quality of their work.
Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Use a common student work analysis protocol during PLCs or collaborative team meetings.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Sort student work by level of mastery and identify patterns in misconceptions or unfinished learning.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Plan instructional responses based on the evidence and revisit student work after reteaching or additional support.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review current grading practices to identify inconsistencies across classrooms or teams.
Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop common expectations for grading standards-based tasks, reassessment, missing work, and feedback.
Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Compare grading evidence with student work and assessment results to determine whether grades reflect demonstrated learning.
Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop a consistent process for sharing assessment information with students and families in clear, understandable language.
Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Include specific next steps when communicating academic progress, such as skills to practice, supports available, or upcoming reassessment opportunities.
Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Use family/student feedback to determine whether assessment communication is understandable and useful.
Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Set implementation goals, collect data aligned to implementation goals (e.g., from instructional walks, PLC work/observations, student work), and analyze data to effectively support reflection and decision-making at the school level.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.
Leadership Team & Academic Coach; Shares: Whole Staff & District Office
High-yield walkthrough tool data dashboards; PLC observation logs & student work protocols
Monthly leadership reviews; Quarterly step-back meetings
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Engage in reflection on the impact of the curriculum and HQIR on students.
Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.
PLC Teams & Guidance Counselors; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership
i-Ready Growth Reports (K–8); CERT score trends (HS); Student focus group feedback
3x per year (i-Ready/CERT Windows); Monthly during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Set yearly implementation goals and develop an aligned monitoring plan.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.
Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: Staff, SBDM, & District Admin
Annual CSIP / Implementation Plan; Key Performance Indicator (KPI) dashboard
Annually (June/July planning)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Utilize the school leadership team to own gathering, organizing and using data and feedback to drive implementation improvements. Continue to use data from formal stepbacks (quarterly, end of year), celebrate “bright spots” to elevate evidence of HQIR’s instructional impact and to identify challenges to potentially refine the implementation plan.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.
School Leadership Team; Shares: Whole Staff & SBDM Council
i-Ready (K–8), CERT (HS), and KSA data analysis packets; Bright spots and challenge reports
3x per year (Post i-Ready/CERT); Annually (Post KSA release)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Continue to participate in learning opportunities and data conversations that help deepen understanding of the HQIR and its instructional shifts.
Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.
Academic Coach & Department Chairs; Shares: Certified Teachers
Advanced EL/IM workshop attendance; Student engagement walkthrough data
Monthly PLCs; Quarterly district PL
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Collect, analyze, and use data from HQIM-embedded assessments to drive the school-specific assessment strategy and implementation improvements.
Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.
PLC Teams & Data Specialist; Shares: Principal & MTSS Team
EL Module & IM Unit mastery charts; i-Ready prerequisite / growth reports
Bi-weekly (Unit assessments); 3x per year (Diagnostics)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Regularly analyze student work and curriculum-embedded assessments to determine student needs and provide aligned intervention as needed.
Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.
MTSS/Tier II Team & PLC Groups; Shares: Principal & District Coordinator
i-Ready progress monitoring probes (K–8); CERT skill-gap tracking (HS); Tier II/III intervention rosters
Weekly/Bi-weekly (Probes); Monthly (MTSS Data Reviews)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Establish a recurring data meeting schedule for PLCs, grade-level teams, or intervention teams.
Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Use a common data protocol to identify strengths, concerns, root causes, and next steps.
Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review academic, behavior, attendance, and access data by student group during scheduled leadership or PLC meetings.
Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Identify where gaps exist in performance, participation, placement, intervention, advanced coursework, or discipline outcomes.
Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Select specific actions to address the gaps and monitor whether those actions improve outcomes over time.
Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review formative and interim data shortly after assessments are administered.
Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Identify standards or skills where students need reteaching, extension, or additional practice.
Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Plan and implement short-cycle instructional responses, then review follow-up evidence to check for improvement.
Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review multiple data sources before placing students in interventions, enrichment, or other supports.
Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Establish clear criteria for entering, adjusting, or exiting supports.
Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Monitor student progress regularly to ensure students are receiving the right level of support.
Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Provide students with age-appropriate data reflection tools or goal-setting templates.
Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Schedule regular student conferences or reflection opportunities focused on progress and next steps.
Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Teach students how to connect their effort, strategies, attendance, and behavior to learning outcomes.
Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review multiple data sources during leadership team meetings, including assessment results, walkthrough trends, attendance, behavior, survey data, and intervention data.
Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Identify whether current programs or supports are producing the intended results for all student groups.
Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Adjust resources, schedules, professional learning, or support structures based on the evidence reviewed.
Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Map current supports across academics, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional learning to identify overlaps, gaps, or unclear processes.
Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Develop clear referral, intervention, and follow-up procedures for students needing additional support.
Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review support data regularly to determine whether students are receiving timely and appropriate assistance.
Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use screening and diagnostic data to identify specific student needs before assigning interventions.
Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Match students to interventions based on the skill, behavior, attendance pattern, or support need identified.
Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review progress monitoring data at scheduled intervals to determine whether to continue, adjust, intensify, or exit the intervention.
Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Define what full implementation of each intervention or support should look like, including frequency, duration, and responsible staff.
Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use documentation logs, intervention records, or fidelity checks to monitor whether supports are being delivered as intended.
Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Provide follow-up support to staff when implementation evidence shows inconsistency.
Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review school schedules to determine whether intervention, enrichment, and support time are protected and accessible.
Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use student need data to assign staff, materials, and support time where they are most needed.
Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Monitor whether students from all groups have access to the supports and opportunities intended for them.
Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review participation data by student group for advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE, or other rigorous opportunities.
Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Identify barriers that may limit access, such as referral practices, prerequisites, scheduling, communication, or student/family awareness.
Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Adjust identification, communication, scheduling, or support processes to increase equitable participation.
Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use tools such as root cause analysis, PDSA cycles, or problem-solving protocols to examine support system concerns.
Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Select a specific adjustment to test, such as a revised referral process, attendance intervention, or progress monitoring routine.
Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review implementation and outcome data to determine whether the adjustment should be continued, revised, or stopped.
Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review and respond to questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data from surveys, focus groups, etc.
Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.
Leadership Team & SBDM Council; Shares: Whole Staff
Anonymous staff implementation climate surveys; Focus group feedback summary sheets
Mid-year (December); End-of-year (May)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Respond to the questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data gathered from surveys, focus groups, etc.
Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.
Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff
Climate & Culture Survey results; Action item follow-up memos
Bi-annually (Nov/April)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Communicate the instructional vision and belief that all students can be successful with rigorous, grade-level work.
Strategy: Build a shared instructional culture by consistently communicating high expectations and the belief that all students can succeed with rigorous, grade-level work.
Principal & SBDM Council; Shares: Staff, Students, & Parents
Principal messages, staff bulletin items, and vision posters; Student survey results
Monthly communications; Quarterly assemblies?
IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Define common expectations for classroom routines, relationships, student discussion, and respectful interactions.
Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Conduct walkthroughs or classroom visits focused on evidence of belonging, engagement, and student willingness to participate.
Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Use student feedback and classroom evidence to identify where additional support is needed.
Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Teach, model, and practice schoolwide behavior expectations and routines throughout the year.
Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Implementation checked during the first 30 days and revisited monthly; trends shared during monthly staff/ILT meetings.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review behavior and referral data to identify common locations, times, or expectations needing reteaching.
Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Provide staff with consistent procedures for responding to behavior concerns and reinforcing positive behavior.
Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Use PLCs or collaborative teams to review student learning, behavior, attendance, and engagement data.
Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Identify shared adult actions that can be implemented across classrooms or teams.
Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Revisit results to determine whether the shared actions are improving student outcomes.
Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Teach SEL and self-management skills through advisory, morning meetings, classroom routines, or explicit lessons.
Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Provide students with tools for goal setting, reflection, conflict resolution, and responsible decision-making.
Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Monitor behavior, attendance, and classroom engagement data to determine whether SEL practices are supporting improved outcomes.
Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Communicate school expectations, academic supports, attendance information, and behavior supports in family-friendly language.
Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Identify community partners who can support attendance, mentoring, enrichment, basic needs, or family engagement.
Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review family feedback and participation data to determine whether communication and partnership efforts are reaching families effectively.
Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Plan tasks that require students to apply learning, explain thinking, solve problems, or connect content to real-world situations.
Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Build in classroom routines that normalize mistakes, revision, and productive struggle.
Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review student work and engagement evidence to determine whether students are participating in meaningful, appropriately challenging learning experiences.
Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Conduct grade-level or content-area standards review sessions focused on unpacking priority standards and identifying the intended depth of learning.
Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
standards unpacking notes; priority standards maps; PLC agendas/minutes showing standards review; teacher-created learning progressions.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Develop or refine common learning intentions and success criteria for upcoming units so students understand what they are expected to learn and how they will demonstrate mastery.
Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review lesson plans, walkthrough evidence, and student work samples to determine whether learning intentions and success criteria are being used consistently.
Strategy: Improve teacher and student clarity around the Kentucky Academic Standards by consistently using learning intentions, success criteria, and aligned instructional resources across classrooms.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Schedule quarterly curriculum checks during PLCs or collaborative team meetings to review pacing, standards alignment, and resource use.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected and analyzed quarterly; summary shared with PLCs/ILT after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use common planning time to compare upcoming instructional materials and assessments to the expectations of the standards.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Adjust unit plans when evidence shows that instruction, resources, or assessments are not fully aligned to grade-level expectations.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum implementation by regularly reviewing units, pacing, instructional resources, and assessments to ensure alignment to the intent and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Hold vertical team meetings at least two times per year to review how key reading and math standards progress across grade levels.
Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected during fall and spring vertical/team reviews; findings shared with ILT and grade/content teams after each session.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Identify prerequisite skills that students need for upcoming grade-level content and determine where those skills will be reinforced.
Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use student work and assessment data to identify common gaps between grade levels and adjust instructional planning accordingly.
Strategy: Increase vertical alignment across grade levels so teachers can better address prerequisite skills, reduce learning gaps, and support progression toward mastery.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review available instructional resources to determine which materials are most aligned to the standards and appropriate for Tier I instruction.
Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Provide teachers with planning support on how to use HQIRs without lowering the rigor of the task or standard.
Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Monitor classroom implementation through walkthroughs, lesson plan reviews, and PLC discussions focused on resource use and student access to grade-level work.
Strategy: Improve the use of high-quality instructional resources by ensuring teachers select, adapt, and implement materials that preserve grade-level expectations while meeting student needs.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use PLCs to review recent assessment results and identify standards where students need reteaching, extension, or additional scaffolding.
Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Plan short-term instructional adjustments based on student evidence, including small groups, targeted practice, or changes to questioning and feedback.
Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Revisit student work after adjustments are made to determine whether students are making progress toward the standard.
Strategy: Improve real-time curriculum adjustments by using formative, interim, and classroom assessment results to refine instruction while maintaining the intent of grade-level standards.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Identify common barriers that prevent students from accessing grade-level reading and math tasks.
Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Plan scaffolds such as vocabulary support, worked examples, models, sentence stems, manipulatives, or guided practice without changing the expected learning outcome.
Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review disaggregated student work and assessment results to determine whether students receiving supports are still engaging with grade-level standards.
Strategy: Increase student access to grade-level curriculum by planning scaffolds, supports, and enrichment opportunities that maintain high expectations for all learners.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Train staff to use the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT) during instructional planning.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)
Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads
Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation evidence; OAT guidance or planning tools.
During initial professional learning and follow-up as needed.
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Use the OAT in PLCs during unit or cycle planning to review instructional materials.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)
Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads
Completed OAT reviews; PLC agendas/minutes; unit or cycle planning artifacts.
During unit or cycle planning in PLCs.
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Revise or supplement lessons and materials based on findings from the OAT review.
Strategy: Strengthen curriculum planning so instructional materials are intentionally reviewed and expanded to be inclusive, reflective, and validating of students. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.1)
Admin team, instructional coach, and PLC leads
Revised or supplemented lessons/materials; follow-up OAT reviews; PLC planning artifacts.
Reviewed during subsequent PLC/unit planning cycles.
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Ensure teachers and specialists have required resource materials for their specific content area and grade level.
Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.
Academic/Instructional Coaches & Department Chairs (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Building Principal & District Curriculum Director
Physical resource audit checklists for EL (ELA) & IM (Math); Staff resource gap/request forms
Annually (Pre-service in August); Bi-weekly (First month of school)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Remove existing resources not outlined in the local curriculum document as primary or potential supplemental resources from classroom use.
Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.
Building Leadership Team & Grade-Level/Department Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers
Classroom inventory checklists; Core curriculum alignment audits
Once per semester (Start of Fall/Spring terms)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Ensure all classrooms have the resources required to access any digital components of the HQIR and staff and students have the appropriate credentials to access them.
Strategy: Ensure staff and students have the materials, digital access, and approved resources needed for consistent HQIR implementation.
Leadership Team; School Technology Lead?; Shares: Principals & Instructional Coaches
Account creation/login success logs for EL, IM, and i-Ready; Student device accessibility audits
Weekly during August/September; Monthly ongoing check-ins
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Communicate the locally determined pacing window aligned to guidance provided by the HQIR.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
Content Area Chairs & Instructional Coaches (Collect/Analyze); Shares: PLC Teams & Principal
EL and IM year-long pacing guides; Unit pacing map alignment checklists
Monthly pacing audits during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Communicate “non-negotiables” related to use of the HQIR.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: All Certified Staff
HQIR implementation non-negotiable matrix; Professional development sign-in sheets
Quarterly review meetings; Annually during pre-service
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Align relevant school-level policies, structures and procedures to support HQIR implementation and increase coherence.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
School Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: SBDM Council & District Leadership
Master schedule alignment audit; PLC operational guidelines & SBDM policies
Bi-annually (Beginning and mid-year)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review and Modify Schedules (if necessary) to ensure adequate time for implementation of the HQIR.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
Principal & Assistant Principal; Shares: Grade-Level Teams & District Admin
Master schedules reflecting required block lengths (e.g., 90-min EL, 60-min IM); WIN/Intervention schedules
Annually in July/August; Quarterly adjustment check
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review any adjustments to policies, structures and procedures relevant to curriculum implementation.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
SBDM Council & Building Principal; Shares: School Leadership Team & Staff
SBDM (policy) minutes; Revised curriculum alignment documentation
Quarterly policy reviews
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review the common observation tool for receiving feedback and relevant indicators related to implementation and instruction.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Principal & Assistant Principals (Collect/Analyze); Shares: Instructional Staff
High-yield practice walkthrough rubrics/scoring; Walkthrough alignment & calibration notes
Monthly calibration sessions; Quarterly feedback trends
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Review roles and expectations for implementation and instruction monitoring, including observation, coaching, feedback, and data analysis from formative, interim, and summative assessments, as well as student work.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Who: Leadership Team & Instructional Coaches; Shares: PLC Teams
Coaching logs & observation schedule calendar; PLC feedback protocols & assessment calendars
Monthly administrative reviews; Quarterly alignment checks
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Create a process for soliciting and responding to questions or feedback from staff about the implementation of the HQIR.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: PLC Leaders & District Curriculum Team
Digital feedback forms / pulse surveys; "Q&A / Feedback" agenda items in PLCs
Bi-weekly during Launch stage; Monthly post-launch
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Communicate key information related to the implementation of the HQIR with students and families.
Strategy: Strengthen communication about HQIR implementation so students, families, and staff understand expectations, changes, and available supports.
Principals & Classroom Teachers; Shares: Parents/Guardians & SBDM Council
Parent newsletters, family curriculum nights, and EL/IM family overview letters
Monthly newsletters; Fall & Winter Open House/Nights
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Engage in PL to build understanding of the instructional approach and design of the HQIR, how it aligns to the instructional vision and what strong implementation looks like.
Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.
Instructional Coaches & District Curriculum Lead; Shares: All Certified Teachers
Pre/Post PL confidence survey data; Attendance & completion tracking logs
Monthly PL sessions
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Monitor pacing to stay within the locally determined window.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Grade-Level/Department Chairs (Collect); Shares: Principal & Academic Coach
EL & IM unit pacing tracker sheets; i-Ready & CERT benchmark testing progress
Bi-weekly in PLCs; 3x per year (Fall, Winter, Spring)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Conduct formal step-backs (quarterly, end of year) to review implementation data and use those discussions to drive improvements in implementation.
Strategy: Establish clear systems for monitoring HQIR implementation, gathering feedback, and using evidence to make timely implementation adjustments.
Principal, Leadership Team, & District Admin; Shares: School Community & SBDM
Quarterly Step-Back data packets; Revised implementation action plans
Quarterly (Oct, Jan, Mar, June)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Clearly communicate what Is and Is Not recommended adjustment of the HQIR (including supplementation).
Strategy: Strengthen implementation coherence by aligning pacing, expectations, schedules, policies, and procedures to the local curriculum and HQIR.
District Curriculum Team & Academic Coach; Shares: All Instructional Staff
HQIR Flexibility Guidance Matrix; PLC unit planning agendas
Annually (Pre-service); At start of new units
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 1: Design and Deploy Standards
Support the onboarding of new staff by providing guidance on the HQIR and lessons learned from initial implementation.
Strategy: Build staff readiness and sustainability through ongoing professional learning, shared understanding of strong HQIR implementation, and intentional onboarding of new staff.
Academic Coach & Mentor Teachers; Shares: Principal
New teacher onboarding checklist; Mentor/Mentee meeting logs
Monthly during year 1
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Ensure curriculum-based professional learning structures (shared learning workshops, PLCs for intellectual preparation, etc.) are in place.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal & PLC Facilitators; Shares: Academic Coach & District Leadership
Master PLC meeting schedules; Dedicated intellectual preparation time logs
Weekly during PLC blocks
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Implement, participate in, and monitor PLCs focused on HQIR implementation.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal, AP, & Academic Coach (Collect); Shares: PLC Teams & District Admin
PLC agenda/minutes digital repository; Walkthrough data from PLC observations
Weekly (Minutes review); Monthly (PLC observation summary)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Protect time in the curriculum-based professional learning structures from being used for initiatives unrelated to implementation.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership
Approved PLC agendas (audited for focus); Time-allocation feedback logs
Bi-weekly agenda audits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Establish expectation that the approved protocols (e.g., unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal, student work analysis) are used to support intellectual preparation within PLCs.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Academic Coach & Grade-Level Chairs; Shares: Classroom Teachers
Completed EL/IM Unit & Lesson Internalization templates?; Student work analysis protocols
Weekly during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide and engage in PL to build understanding of intellectual preparation, beginning with unit internalization, and provide time for PLCs to internalize units.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
District Specialists & Academic Coach; Shares: School Leadership Team
Unit internalization artifacts (e.g., annotated EL/IM units); PL evaluation exit tickets
Monthly dedicated sessions; At start of each unit
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Create and execute a PL plan aligned to the implementation goals and set the expectation for required participation.
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
Academic Coach & Principal; Shares: Certified Staff
PL attendance records & implementation surveys; Walkthrough indicators of PL application
Monthly PL tracking; Quarterly efficacy reviews
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Engage in shared learning to build understanding of the core processes of intellectual preparation (unit and lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis) using the district-determined protocols.
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Department/Grade-Level Teams
Completed student work analysis protocols
Weekly during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Participate in professional learning opportunities that deepen understanding of the HQIR’s instructional design and use in classroom practice.
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
District Curriculum Specialists & Vendors; Shares: Teachers & Building Admin
Coaching logs & model classroom visit notes; High-yield walkthrough practice growth metrics
Monthly coaching rounds; Quarterly growth audits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Regularly observe teacher practice and provide feedback on HQIR implementation using a common observational tool (e.g., vendor-specific tool, KDE-provided observation tool).
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Principal, AP, & Academic Coach; Shares: Individual Teachers & Staff
Walkthrough tool data (focus on student collaboration & engagement); Coaching feedback email/logs
Weekly (5–10 walks per admin); Bi-weekly individual check-ins
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide professional learning, including coaching, classroom observations, targeted feedback and model classroom visits anchored in the HQIR.
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
Academic Coach & Master Teachers; Shares: Principal & District Specialists
Coaching cycle logs & pre/post observation forms; Peer observation reflection sheets
Bi-weekly coaching cycles; Monthly model classroom visits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use the HQIR as designed and ensure the majority of instruction is spent engaged with the HQIR.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Administrative Team; Shares: Teachers & PLC Teams
Walkthrough tool fidelity ratings (EL/IM adherence); Daily schedule / time-on-task checks
Weekly walkthroughs; Monthly trend reporting
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use HQIR-embedded supports to ensure all students can engage in grade-level work.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
ECE Lead, ELL Teachers, & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal
Lesson plan audits (scaffolds/accommodations); i-Ready diagnostic tier movement (K–8); CERT subgroup performance (HS)
Weekly during PLC planning; 3x per year post-diagnostics
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Document if/when the HQIR resources may need refinement (e.g., for alignment to the KAS) and communicate with school/district leaders.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Department Chairs & Academic Coach; Shares: District Curriculum Director
HQIR refinement log / feedback form; KAS alignment gap documentation
Monthly submission to district
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Co-observe classrooms with district leaders.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Building Admin & District Supervisors; Shares: Observed Teachers
Co-observation calibration notes; Walkthrough tool data validity reports
Quarterly co-observation rounds
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Observe PLCs and provide feedback on intellectual preparation (unit/lesson internalization, lesson rehearsal and student work analysis).
Strategy: Strengthen PLC and intellectual preparation structures so teachers have protected time, common protocols, and feedback to plan for effective HQIR-based instruction.
Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators
PLC observation rubric & feedback notes; Intellectual prep artifact quality checks
Bi-weekly PLC observations
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide ongoing opportunities for teachers to develop leadership capacities, including classroom practice specific to HQIR implementation and facilitating intellectual preparation in PLCs.
Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.
Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: Leadership Council
Lead Teacher / PLC Facilitator training logs; Peer coaching debrief forms
Monthly teacher leader meetings
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Sustain a collaborative environment where professional learning communities use their collective strengths, skills and experience to improve classroom practice related to HQIR implementation.
Strategy: Develop teacher leadership and collective responsibility for improving HQIR implementation and classroom practice.
PLC Leaders & Academic Coach; Shares: Building Principal
PLC peer feedback forms & self-evaluations; Collaborative unit plans
Weekly (PLCs); Quarterly culture audits
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Engage with school leaders in identifying personal targets for feedback and support.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Classroom Teachers & Instructional Coach; Shares: Principal (PGP alignment)
Professional Growth Plans (PGPs); Coaching goal tracking logs
Bi-annually (Fall target set, Spring review)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Develop and execute a district-aligned professional learning plan that addresses teacher needs related to HQIR implementation and making adjustments to the curriculum. LE COMMENT: Slightly abridged
Strategy: Build teacher capacity to deliver HQIR effectively through a coherent professional learning plan, coaching, modeling, and job-embedded learning.
District Curriculum Director & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff
District PL completion reports; Classroom walkthrough implementation trends
Quarterly progress reports
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide feedback to teachers on the facilitation of intellectual prep within PLCs and on skillful use of HQIR in classrooms to meet students’ diverse learning needs.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Principal & Academic Coach; Shares: PLC Facilitators & Teachers
Walkthrough tool reports (differentiation/talk focus); PLC feedback summary forms
Bi-weekly walkthrough notes; Monthly coaching meetings
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Establish time for reflection on the ways in which teachers use HQIR to support diverse learning needs through curriculum embedded supports. Provide opportunities for teachers to observe each other’s practice and share feedback.
Strategy: Improve instructional practice through regular observation, feedback, reflection, and collaborative learning focused on HQIR implementation and student needs.
Academic Coach & Teachers; Shares: Grade-Level Teams
Peer observation reflection forms; EL/IM scaffolding utilization logs
1x per semester per teacher
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Make smart adjustments to the HQIR using information about students’ needs and performance.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
PLC Teams & Interventionists; Shares: Academic Coach & AP
i-Ready grouping & flexible rotation rosters; WIN block intervention schedules
Bi-weekly in PLCs; Every 3 weeks (MTSS check)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Purposefully leverage scaffolds within the HQIR to support all students in accessing grade-level learning and reaching unit and lesson goals.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Classroom Teachers & Interventionists; Shares: PLC Teams
Scaffolding logs (graphic organizers, sentence frames); Walkthrough tool data on student participation
Weekly during lesson prep; Weekly walkthroughs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Purposefully plan connections to students’ backgrounds and experiences to enhance relevance in the classroom environment.
Strategy: Improve responsive Tier I instruction by using HQIR as designed, leveraging embedded supports, and making evidence-based adjustments that preserve grade-level expectations.
Classroom Teachers; Shares: PLC Teams & Leadership
Student interest inventory results; Culturally responsive lesson plans
At start of each EL/IM unit
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Identify two schoolwide culturally responsive instructional practices from the Opportunity and Access Tool (OAT).
Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)
Admin team and instructional coach
Selected schoolwide practices and OAT review evidence.
At the start of the implementation cycle; revisit as needed.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Introduce and model the selected practices during staff meetings, PLCs, or Gold Days.
Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)
Admin team and instructional coach
Meeting/PL agendas, modeling materials, staff participation artifacts.
During planned staff learning sessions.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Plan for and use the selected practices during instruction.
Strategy: Increase consistent use of culturally responsive instructional practices so classroom instruction better supports engagement, access, and learning for Students of Color. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.2)
Admin team and instructional coach
Walkthrough evidence aligned to the selected practices; disaggregated implementation results; coaching notes.
Monthly walkthrough review; quarterly trend review.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide professional learning on culturally responsive teaching, implicit bias, and inclusive practices.
Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)
Admin team and instructional coach
Professional learning agendas/materials; staff participation and reflection artifacts.
At planned professional learning sessions.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Identify two or three inclusive instructional strategies for staff to apply in instruction.
Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)
Admin team and instructional coach
Selected strategy list; lesson/planning artifacts; walkthrough evidence.
Reviewed monthly through planning/walkthrough evidence.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide time for reflection, collaboration, and coaching connected to the selected strategies.
Strategy: Build staff capacity to apply culturally responsive and inclusive practices in classrooms through targeted professional learning, reflection, and coaching. (Domain 2 - Policy Expectation 2.1)
Admin team and instructional coach
Staff reflections, meeting agendas, coaching notes, and follow-up walkthrough evidence.
Quarterly reflection and coaching review.
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use a common lesson planning protocol that includes standards, learning intentions, success criteria, checks for understanding, and planned scaffolds.
Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Conduct regular walkthroughs focused on evidence of clear learning expectations and student access to grade-level work.
Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use PLC time to revise upcoming lessons based on student needs and evidence from prior instruction.
Strategy: Improve the consistency of Tier I instruction by ensuring lessons are standards-aligned, clearly communicated to students, and intentionally scaffolded for diverse learners.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide professional learning on instructional practices such as modeling, questioning, academic discussion, feedback, and gradual release.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Have teachers plan specific opportunities for students to explain reasoning, discuss ideas, revise work, or justify answers.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use peer observation, coaching, or walkthrough feedback to support implementation of the selected instructional practices.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher use of evidence-based instructional practices that increase student thinking, discussion, feedback use, and engagement with rigorous tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Develop a walkthrough focus connected to the school’s instructional priority, such as success criteria, questioning, student discourse, or feedback.
Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Share walkthrough trends with teachers during PLCs, staff meetings, or coaching conversations.
Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use the trends to identify specific instructional adjustments and follow up to determine whether the adjustments are evident in classrooms.
Strategy: Improve instructional monitoring by using walkthroughs, lesson evidence, and student work to identify needed adjustments before, during, and after instruction.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Teach students how to use success criteria, rubrics, checklists, or exemplars to assess their own progress.
Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Build in regular student reflection or goal-setting opportunities connected to academic, behavior, or attendance data.
Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Provide time for students to revise work based on feedback and explain what they changed and why.
Strategy: Increase student ownership of learning by helping students understand learning expectations, monitor their progress, and use feedback to improve their work.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use exit tickets, student work, formative checks, or common assessments to identify students who need additional support or extension.
Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Regroup students for short-term support based on the specific skill or standard being addressed.
Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Review follow-up evidence to determine whether the instructional adjustment improved student understanding.
Strategy: Improve instructional responsiveness by using classroom evidence and assessment results to adjust grouping, pacing, scaffolds, and feedback.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Review lesson tasks for opportunities to connect content to student interests, real-world issues, cultural connections, or meaningful problem-solving.
Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding; PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Gather student feedback on engagement, belonging, and access to learning tasks.
Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 2: Design and Deliver Instruction
Use feedback and classroom evidence to adjust instructional examples, texts, tasks, or discussion structures.
Strategy: Increase student engagement and access by ensuring lessons are relevant, culturally responsive, and connected to students’ developmental and learning needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Analyze student work from HQIR-embedded assessments to identify strengths and gaps in student learning.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of HQIR-embedded assessments and student work so teachers identify strengths, gaps, and next instructional steps.
Classroom Teachers & PLC Teams; Shares: Academic Coach & Principal
EL module assessments & IM end-of-unit tests; Standardized student work rubric scores
Bi-weekly during PLC cycles
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Communicate schoolwide expectations for assessment, grading, feedback, revision, and communication of student progress to families.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Schoolwide assessment/grading expectations; communication materials; evidence of consistent implementation.
Reviewed at the beginning of the year and periodically during PLC cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Provide professional learning on using success criteria to determine student progress.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Professional learning artifacts; success criteria; student work showing use of criteria.
During PLC/professional learning cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop, review, and refine common assessments in PLCs to ensure alignment to grade-level standards and intended rigor.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Common assessments; alignment reviews; PLC notes; assessment revisions.
Monthly or during assessment development/review cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Use student work and assessment data to plan feedback, revision, reteaching, and next instructional steps.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Common assessment data; student work; evidence of feedback/revision; reteaching plans; disaggregated diagnostic/assessment data.
After each assessment window and during PLC cycles.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review and revise the school’s grading system through PLC and administrative team discussions.
Strategy: Strengthen assessment practices so teachers use aligned assessments, success criteria, feedback, and revision opportunities to support student mastery. (Domain 1 - Policy Expectation 1.3)
PLCs and admin team
Grading practices/policies; PLC and administrative team notes; evidence of revisions.
Quarterly.
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Create or review the school’s assessment calendar to identify when each type of assessment is used and what decision it informs.
Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review assessments during PLCs to check alignment to standards, learning intentions, and success criteria.
Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Clarify how teachers will use assessment results for reteaching, regrouping, enrichment, intervention, or progress monitoring.
Strategy: Improve the use of a balanced assessment system by ensuring formative, diagnostic, interim, and summative assessments are aligned to standards and used for clear instructional purposes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Provide professional learning on assessment alignment, item/task rigor, success criteria, and common scoring expectations.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Have teams review assessment items or tasks before administration to determine whether they match the standard and expected depth of knowledge.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Revise or replace assessment items that do not provide useful evidence of student mastery.
Strategy: Strengthen teacher assessment literacy so classroom and common assessments accurately measure the intended learning and rigor of the standards.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop common expectations for how success criteria will be shared, referenced, and used during instruction.
Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Plan opportunities for students to receive feedback tied directly to the success criteria.
Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
posted/shared learning intentions and success criteria; lesson plans; rubrics/checklists/exemplars; student work annotated against success criteria; student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review student work samples to determine whether feedback is helping students improve the quality of their work.
Strategy: Improve the use of feedback and success criteria so students and teachers can identify current progress, next steps, and evidence of mastery.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Use a common student work analysis protocol during PLCs or collaborative team meetings.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Sort student work by level of mastery and identify patterns in misconceptions or unfinished learning.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Plan instructional responses based on the evidence and revisit student work after reteaching or additional support.
Strategy: Strengthen collaborative analysis of student work and assessment results to determine whether students are meeting grade-level expectations.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Review current grading practices to identify inconsistencies across classrooms or teams.
Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop common expectations for grading standards-based tasks, reassessment, missing work, and feedback.
Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Compare grading evidence with student work and assessment results to determine whether grades reflect demonstrated learning.
Strategy: Improve grading consistency so grades more accurately reflect student learning of standards-based content.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Develop a consistent process for sharing assessment information with students and families in clear, understandable language.
Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Include specific next steps when communicating academic progress, such as skills to practice, supports available, or upcoming reassessment opportunities.
Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 3: Design and Deliver Assessment Literacy
Use family/student feedback to determine whether assessment communication is understandable and useful.
Strategy: Improve communication of assessment results so students and families understand progress, needs, and next steps.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; student feedback samples; before/after student work.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Set implementation goals, collect data aligned to implementation goals (e.g., from instructional walks, PLC work/observations, student work), and analyze data to effectively support reflection and decision-making at the school level.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.
Leadership Team & Academic Coach; Shares: Whole Staff & District Office
High-yield walkthrough tool data dashboards; PLC observation logs & student work protocols
Monthly leadership reviews; Quarterly step-back meetings
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Engage in reflection on the impact of the curriculum and HQIR on students.
Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.
PLC Teams & Guidance Counselors; Shares: SBDM & District Leadership
i-Ready Growth Reports (K–8); CERT score trends (HS); Student focus group feedback
3x per year (i-Ready/CERT Windows); Monthly during PLCs
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Establish a recurring data meeting schedule for PLCs, grade-level teams, or intervention teams.
Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Use a common data protocol to identify strengths, concerns, root causes, and next steps.
Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Identify where gaps exist in performance, participation, placement, intervention, advanced coursework, or discipline outcomes.
Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Select specific actions to address the gaps and monitor whether those actions improve outcomes over time.
Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review formative and interim data shortly after assessments are administered.
Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Identify standards or skills where students need reteaching, extension, or additional practice.
Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Plan and implement short-cycle instructional responses, then review follow-up evidence to check for improvement.
Strategy: Improve the use of formative and interim assessment data so teachers make timely instructional adjustments before students fall further behind.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected weekly or after each short instructional cycle; analyzed in PLCs within 1–2 weeks and shared with ILT monthly.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review multiple data sources before placing students in interventions, enrichment, or other supports.
Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Establish clear criteria for entering, adjusting, or exiting supports.
Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Monitor student progress regularly to ensure students are receiving the right level of support.
Strategy: Improve student placement and support decisions by using academic, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional data to guide grouping, intervention, enrichment, and scheduling.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Provide students with age-appropriate data reflection tools or goal-setting templates.
Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Schedule regular student conferences or reflection opportunities focused on progress and next steps.
Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Teach students how to connect their effort, strategies, attendance, and behavior to learning outcomes.
Strategy: Increase student involvement in data use by helping students understand their academic, attendance, and behavior data and set goals for improvement.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review multiple data sources during leadership team meetings, including assessment results, walkthrough trends, attendance, behavior, survey data, and intervention data.
Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; walkthrough tool results; coaching notes.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Identify whether current programs or supports are producing the intended results for all student groups.
Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Adjust resources, schedules, professional learning, or support structures based on the evidence reviewed.
Strategy: Strengthen leadership team use of qualitative and quantitative data to evaluate whether instructional programs, interventions, and organizational conditions are improving student outcomes.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and teacher leaders collect implementation evidence; ILT reviews needs and shares next steps with staff.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments; professional learning agendas/materials; attendance records; teacher reflection/implementation logs.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Map current supports across academics, behavior, attendance, and social-emotional learning to identify overlaps, gaps, or unclear processes.
Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Develop clear referral, intervention, and follow-up procedures for students needing additional support.
Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review support data regularly to determine whether students are receiving timely and appropriate assistance.
Strategy: Improve alignment of academic, behavioral, attendance, and social-emotional supports so students receive timely assistance based on identified needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use screening and diagnostic data to identify specific student needs before assigning interventions.
Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected after each assessment window; analyzed in PLC/MTSS meetings within 1–2 weeks; summary shared with ILT and staff each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Match students to interventions based on the skill, behavior, attendance pattern, or support need identified.
Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review progress monitoring data at scheduled intervals to determine whether to continue, adjust, intensify, or exit the intervention.
Strategy: Strengthen intervention decision making by using screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring data to match supports and evaluate effectiveness.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Define what full implementation of each intervention or support should look like, including frequency, duration, and responsible staff.
Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use documentation logs, intervention records, or fidelity checks to monitor whether supports are being delivered as intended.
Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Provide follow-up support to staff when implementation evidence shows inconsistency.
Strategy: Improve the fidelity of intervention and support processes by clarifying expectations for implementation, documentation, review, and adjustment.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 6
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review school schedules to determine whether intervention, enrichment, and support time are protected and accessible.
Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use student need data to assign staff, materials, and support time where they are most needed.
Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
curriculum review/check documents; pacing guides; HQIR/resource alignment checklists; records of unit or resource adjustments.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Monitor whether students from all groups have access to the supports and opportunities intended for them.
Strategy: Increase equitable access to resources and supports by aligning staffing, schedules, intervention time, and materials to identified student needs.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review participation data by student group for advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE, or other rigorous opportunities.
Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Identify barriers that may limit access, such as referral practices, prerequisites, scheduling, communication, or student/family awareness.
Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Adjust identification, communication, scheduling, or support processes to increase equitable participation.
Strategy: Increase access to rigorous learning opportunities by monitoring participation in advanced coursework, enrichment, gifted services, CTE pathways, and other opportunity-based programs.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected during scheduling/resource planning and reviewed each semester; shared with ILT and relevant teams before adjustments are finalized.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26; Standard 29
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Use tools such as root cause analysis, PDSA cycles, or problem-solving protocols to examine support system concerns.
Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
PDSA/root cause analysis tools; implementation check notes; before/after outcome data; decision records showing continue/revise/stop.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Select a specific adjustment to test, such as a revised referral process, attendance intervention, or progress monitoring routine.
Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 5: Design, Align, Deliver Support Processes
Review implementation and outcome data to determine whether the adjustment should be continued, revised, or stopped.
Strategy: Improve continuous improvement of support systems by regularly reviewing barriers, testing adjustments, and measuring the impact on student outcomes.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review and respond to questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data from surveys, focus groups, etc.
Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.
Leadership Team & SBDM Council; Shares: Whole Staff
Anonymous staff implementation climate surveys; Focus group feedback summary sheets
Mid-year (December); End-of-year (May)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Respond to the questions, concerns and attitudes of staff regarding early implementation of the local curriculum and HQIR using data gathered from surveys, focus groups, etc.
Strategy: Strengthen a supportive implementation culture by using staff feedback to identify concerns, respond to needs, and adjust implementation supports.
Leadership Team & Principal; Shares: Whole Staff
Climate & Culture Survey results; Action item follow-up memos
Bi-annually (Nov/April)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Communicate the instructional vision and belief that all students can be successful with rigorous, grade-level work.
Strategy: Build a shared instructional culture by consistently communicating high expectations and the belief that all students can succeed with rigorous, grade-level work.
Principal & SBDM Council; Shares: Staff, Students, & Parents
Principal messages, staff bulletin items, and vision posters; Student survey results
Monthly communications; Quarterly assemblies?
IP/Cognia alignment: IP - None
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Define common expectations for classroom routines, relationships, student discussion, and respectful interactions.
Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Conduct walkthroughs or classroom visits focused on evidence of belonging, engagement, and student willingness to participate.
Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, and designated walkthrough team collect evidence; ILT reviews trends and shares feedback with staff.
walkthrough tool results; coaching notes; peer observation forms; classroom evidence aligned to the focus area; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected during biweekly or monthly walkthrough/coaching cycles; analyzed monthly; trends shared with staff and PLCs.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Use student feedback and classroom evidence to identify where additional support is needed.
Strategy: Strengthen classroom learning environments so students experience clear expectations, positive relationships, respectful interactions, and support for academic risk-taking.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Teach, model, and practice schoolwide behavior expectations and routines throughout the year.
Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Implementation checked during the first 30 days and revisited monthly; trends shared during monthly staff/ILT meetings.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review behavior and referral data to identify common locations, times, or expectations needing reteaching.
Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Provide staff with consistent procedures for responding to behavior concerns and reinforcing positive behavior.
Strategy: Improve consistency of schoolwide expectations and routines to reduce disruptions and increase time available for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Use PLCs or collaborative teams to review student learning, behavior, attendance, and engagement data.
Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Identify shared adult actions that can be implemented across classrooms or teams.
Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Revisit results to determine whether the shared actions are improving student outcomes.
Strategy: Strengthen staff collective efficacy by using collaborative structures where adults share responsibility for student outcomes and adjust practices together.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 6; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Teach SEL and self-management skills through advisory, morning meetings, classroom routines, or explicit lessons.
Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Provide students with tools for goal setting, reflection, conflict resolution, and responsible decision-making.
Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Monitor behavior, attendance, and classroom engagement data to determine whether SEL practices are supporting improved outcomes.
Strategy: Strengthen social-emotional learning and self-management practices so students better understand expectations, regulate behavior, and take responsibility for learning.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 6
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Communicate school expectations, academic supports, attendance information, and behavior supports in family-friendly language.
Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence; student engagement/belonging survey results; reteaching plans for expectations; family communication logs; copies of newsletters/messages.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Identify community partners who can support attendance, mentoring, enrichment, basic needs, or family engagement.
Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review family feedback and participation data to determine whether communication and partnership efforts are reaching families effectively.
Strategy: Improve family and community partnership structures so families receive clear communication and can help support student attendance, behavior, and learning.
Principal/AP, family engagement lead, counselor, and teacher leaders collect feedback; ILT reviews and shares results with staff/families as appropriate.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts.
Collected at least once per semester, with brief pulse checks as needed; analyzed by ILT and shared with staff/families after each cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Plan tasks that require students to apply learning, explain thinking, solve problems, or connect content to real-world situations.
Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
lesson/unit plans; planning protocol templates; copies of revised tasks/materials; evidence of planned scaffolds and checks for understanding.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Build in classroom routines that normalize mistakes, revision, and productive struggle.
Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.
Principal/AP, instructional coach, PLC leads, and classroom teachers collect evidence; ILT analyzes trends and shares next steps with staff.
student feedback samples; before/after student work; revision opportunities in lesson plans; student reflection notes; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data; SEL or advisory lesson evidence.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 6: Establish Learning Environment and Culture
Review student work and engagement evidence to determine whether students are participating in meaningful, appropriately challenging learning experiences.
Strategy: Increase authentic learning opportunities where students collaborate, persist through mistakes, reflect on their learning, and connect classroom work to meaningful tasks.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
formative/interim/common assessment results; student work samples; data protocol notes; reteaching/enrichment plans; progress monitoring graphs or trackers; attendance and behavior dashboards; referral/discipline data.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 29
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Document agreed-upon instructional or support responses and revisit the data to determine whether the response worked.
Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Set yearly implementation goals and develop an aligned monitoring plan.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.
Principal & Leadership Team; Shares: Staff, SBDM, & District Admin
Annual CSIP / Implementation Plan; Key Performance Indicator (KPI) dashboard
Annually (June/July planning)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Utilize the school leadership team to own gathering, organizing and using data and feedback to drive implementation improvements. Continue to use data from formal stepbacks (quarterly, end of year), celebrate “bright spots” to elevate evidence of HQIR’s instructional impact and to identify challenges to potentially refine the implementation plan.
Strategy: Strengthen implementation monitoring by setting clear goals, organizing multiple sources of evidence, and using regular review cycles to guide schoolwide improvement.
School Leadership Team; Shares: Whole Staff & SBDM Council
i-Ready (K–8), CERT (HS), and KSA data analysis packets; Bright spots and challenge reports
3x per year (Post i-Ready/CERT); Annually (Post KSA release)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Continue to participate in learning opportunities and data conversations that help deepen understanding of the HQIR and its instructional shifts.
Strategy: Use implementation, outcome, and stakeholder evidence to reflect on the impact of curriculum and professional learning and identify needed adjustments.
Academic Coach & Department Chairs; Shares: Certified Teachers
Advanced EL/IM workshop attendance; Student engagement walkthrough data
Monthly PLCs; Quarterly district PL
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Collect, analyze, and use data from HQIM-embedded assessments to drive the school-specific assessment strategy and implementation improvements.
Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.
PLC Teams & Data Specialist; Shares: Principal & MTSS Team
EL Module & IM Unit mastery charts; i-Ready prerequisite / growth reports
Bi-weekly (Unit assessments); 3x per year (Diagnostics)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Regularly analyze student work and curriculum-embedded assessments to determine student needs and provide aligned intervention as needed.
Strategy: Use curriculum-embedded assessments, student work, and progress data to identify student needs and guide timely instructional or intervention decisions.
MTSS/Tier II Team & PLC Groups; Shares: Principal & District Coordinator
i-Ready progress monitoring probes (K–8); CERT skill-gap tracking (HS); Tier II/III intervention rosters
Weekly/Bi-weekly (Probes); Monthly (MTSS Data Reviews)
IP/Cognia alignment: IP 1; IP 2
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Document agreed-upon instructional or support responses and revisit the data to determine whether the response worked.
Strategy: Improve data-based decision making by using a consistent process to review academic, behavior, and attendance data and identify instructional or support responses.
Principal/AP, counselor, intervention team/MTSS lead, data lead, and PLC teams collect and analyze data; ILT shares trends and needed actions.
implementation artifacts related to the activity; PLC/ILT meeting notes; student outcome or perception data connected to the activity; follow-up action steps.
Collected monthly or during scheduled PLC/ILT cycles; analyzed and shared with staff at least monthly or after each review cycle.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 22; Standard 26
KCWP 4: Review, Analyze, Apply Data
Review academic, behavior, attendance, and access data by student group during scheduled leadership or PLC meetings.
Strategy: Strengthen the use of disaggregated data to identify achievement gaps, opportunity gaps, and patterns in student access to supports or rigorous learning.
PLC/Collaborative Team Leads, classroom teachers, and instructional coach; principal/AP reviews and shares trends with ILT.
PLC/vertical team agendas and minutes; team action plans; evidence of decisions made and follow-up actions; disaggregated participation/access data; barrier analysis notes; student/family communication artifacts; adjusted referral or placement criteria.
Collected weekly or monthly depending on the metric; analyzed monthly by ILT/MTSS; shared with staff after each review.
IP/Cognia alignment: Standard 26